Man, 66, says he was turned away from donating blood after he refused to answer if he was pregnant

A male retiree who says he has regularly donated blood for five decades was rejected at his most recent appointment when he refused to answer an irrelevant, but now standard, pregnancy-related question contained in the required screening paperwork.

Leslie Sinclair, 66, reportedly has generously donated 125 pints of blood over his lifetime, but the “inclusive” Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service more or less cancelled him for standing on principle when he declined to respond to that particular gender-neutral entry on the pre-donation questionnaire.

“There is always a form to fill in and that’s fine – they tend to ask about medical conditions or diseases – and clearly that’s because the blood needs to be safe. This time around, there was a question I hadn’t seen before: ‘Are you pregnant, or have you been in the last six months?’ which required a yes or no answer,” Sinclair told the Daily Mail. “‘I pointed out to the staff that it was impossible for me to be in that position but I was told that I would need to answer, otherwise I couldn’t give blood.”

Sinclair, who described the situation as “stupid” and “nonsensical,” left the venue,  jumped on his bike, and pedaled back to his residence in central Scotland.

The public-spirited senior also mentioned that the policy could potentially deny blood to patients, including children, who are in desperate need of a transfusion in the hospital. He apparently no longer plans to donate in the future.

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1538541145675837441

“[T]hey’ve been denied my blood because of the obligation to answer a question that can’t possibly be answered,” Sinclair asserted in summary.

Thanking Sinclair for his longtime commitment, Prof. Marc Turner, the SNBTS director since January 2022, claimed that “Whilst pregnancy is only a relevant question to those whose biological sex or sex assigned at birth is female, sex assigned at birth is not always visually clear to staff. As a public body we take cognizance of changes in society around how such questions may be asked without discrimination and have a duty to promote inclusiveness – therefore all donors are now asked the same questions.”

SNBTS is partnering with the U.K.’s government-run National Health Service to address a shortage in blood donors.

On its website, the organization declares that “Our key priority is to ensure that NHSScotland has enough blood to meet the transfusion needs of patients in Scotland.”

“With ‘pregnant men’ becoming the new forefront for rights from radical progressives, the rigid viewpoint continues to exclude ordinary people who refuse to conform to the new belief,” Outkick noted.

Or as Dr. Oz, the GOP nominee for U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania has contended (although in the COVID context), “When you mix medicine and politics, you get politics.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In this case, it amounts to identity politics from the far left that seems to have captured the bureaucracies of many Western institutions, including those which profess to be following science.

As a practical matter, the Scotland-based organization could have perhaps preempted the controversy in the first place by adding an N/A (not applicable) option to that particular question.

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Robert Jonathan

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

4 thoughts on “Man, 66, says he was turned away from donating blood after he refused to answer if he was pregnant

  1. Because, of course, not only can men become pregnant, but 66-year-old men are especially known for getting pregnant, right? 😵‍💫🤮 When are people going to start using common sense again and stop catering to the mentally-ill transgendered people?

  2. If the potential male donor was so dishonest as to “identify” as female wouldn’t it follow that they wouldn’t hesitate to mark “no” in the pregnant question? So why play such a silly game with something as important as blood donations?

  3. Changes in society do not change a persons sex. Doctors do. Then society has to respond to their mad scientist experiments. Hey Biden , how about following the science. Your already a freak, might as well complete the transaction. You girlie boy . Joey

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles