Union officials have accused Starbucks of retaliation after the coffee giant permanently closed a store location in New York.
On Friday, a formal complaint was filed with the U.S. National Labor Relations Board by the Workers Union claiming that the Ithaca, New York store was being closed out of retaliation for the workers’ recent vote to unionize, Bloomberg reported.
Starbucks denied the allegations and noted that the store didn’t make the cut due to”time and attendance” issues as well as other facilities and staffing issues at the location near Cornell University’s campus.
“We open and close stores as a regular part of our operations,” Reggie Borges, a spokesperson for Starbucks said on Friday.
“With deep care and urgency we continuously work to create the kind of store environment that partners and customers expect of Starbucks. Our goal is to ensure that every partner is supported in their individual situation, and we have immediate opportunities available in the market,” he added.
Employees at the shop voted to unionize in April and held a one-day strike against “unsafe” working conditions after a grease trap overflowed on the floor.
Starbucks quickly folds on allowing workers to wear BLM attire, co-designs t-shirts to sweeten the deal https://t.co/q3mEwHHhlZ
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) June 12, 2020
Starbucks employees were livid over the announcement that the recently unionized store would be closing.
“Starbucks won’t get away with retaliating against us like this,” store employee, Evan Sunshine, said in a statement emailed from the union.
“Whatever it takes, however long it may take, we will persevere,” he said.
Starbucks attorney Alan Model reached out to the union on Friday to inform them of the planned closure and to attempt to negotiate regarding the potential impact the employees would face from the store shuttering its doors.
“As you know, there have been many issues with regard to the condition of the store (e.g., the grease trap) and it does not make sense to further operate the store,” Model said in an email.
Workers United leader Gary Bonadonna Jr. issued a statement about the store’s closing, calling it a “blatant act of war” against the members of the newly organized union.
“We have their backs,” Bonadonna said.
Starbucks employees vote to unionize https://t.co/UFo1VnHlOg
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) December 10, 2021
Late last year, a Starbucks location in Buffalo, New York was the first to vote to unionize in the company’s 50-year history with a 19 to 8 vote in favor of unionizing.
Two other Buffalo locations also held votes to unionize but the Camp Road store rejected unionization with a 12 to 8 vote. The third location on Genesee Street’s vote was inconclusive after multiple ballots were reportedly changed.
BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Watch: Suspect hits unsuspecting NYC man in back of the head with a baseball bat – in broad daylight - December 4, 2022
- Uber-hawk John Bolton says Trump’s ‘act is old and tired now,’ calls for ‘next generation’ of Republicans - November 27, 2022
- ‘Big yikes!’ SNL cold open mocking Biden and Dems over midterms painfully unfunny - November 6, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
12 thoughts on “Starbucks accused of ‘retaliating’ against union officials with NY store closure”
Comments are closed.
Starbucks, please put signs in your windows to let the public know which stores have unionized. We, the public, supported your efforts to provide your employees with outstanding benefits throughout the past 3 decades(?) by paying exorbitant prices for your coffee. The current “snowflakes” have pushed us too far…………..now, your employees are not worth an extra fee for their narcissism.”
Better for them to close it now rather then wait until they have lost so much money from having a bunch of union employees wanting big bucks for no work. Sorry but the unions are just as bad as the company owners were at the start of the last century. Power breeds corruption. Just look at Congress.
this is what unions do. Fewer jobs, shoddy work, companies automating and shutting down.
Yes. However I do not like your new comment page. However, I will use it for now. It’s inferior to the comment page, sans the advertisements, than this format. The advertisements in comment form are disgusting and juvenile.
Everyone knows their magical mystical marketing that increases profits. There’s the same amount of product in a tall, (small) as there is in a large. Buying a medium or large, make you feel you are getting more coffee, but you are just paying more.
All of them closing? What a good idea. Black Rifle Company can open in their empty locations. How refreshing.
Good for Starbucks. Unions at one time were of benefit, but not any more. I’ll get my grande coffee from SBUX. It you don’t like their decision/action, get your coffee from another venue. Simple and the free market way.
Looks like “woke vs. woke” in a real Lefty town. Awwwwwww. 😎
Go woke, go broke.
They’ve burnt their coffee beans.
Oh pulease don’t throw me in the briar patch.
I bought my first cup of SB coffee 10 or 15 years ago. I haven’t had one since. Yuk. I used to go to my local Kroger owned store for coffee and doughnut several mornings a week. Never again since they switched to SB.