California’s bid to unmask ICE agents goes down in flames

An appeals court on Wednesday blocked a California law from taking effect that would force federal immigration law enforcement officials to unmask and wear visible ID when on patrol.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a section of California’s No Vigilantes Act, which required federal law enforcement agents, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), to wear visible ID, violated the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. The bill passed both chambers of the California legislature, and Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it into law in September 2025.

“We conclude that § 10 of the No Vigilantes Act attempts to directly regulate the United States in its performance of governmental functions,” The court’s opinion, authored by Trump-appointed Judge Mark Bennett, read in part. “The Supremacy Clause forbids the State from enforcing such legislation.”

BREAKING: The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an injunction blocking enforcement of California’s new law that requires ICE agents to unmask and wear visible ID, arguing it violates the Supremacy Clause because it “attempts to directly regulate the United States in its… pic.twitter.com/jedIEO0z2N

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 22, 2026

Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Section 10 of California’s No Vigilantes Act required officials to display some type of identification that stated which agency they worked for and their name or a badge number. The section did not extend to those in undercover operations or those working in the state and stated that failure to comply was a misdemeanor under the law.

“Section 10 of the No Vigilantes Act attempts to directly regulate the federal government in its performance of law enforcement operations. It expressly applies to federal officers,” the ruling continued. “It seeks to control their conduct in performing law enforcement operations.”

“Huge legal victory this morning in the Ninth Circuit, where the court permanently enjoined California’s unconstitutional mask law targeting federal agents,” U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli wrote on X about the ruling.

Huge legal victory this morning in the Ninth Circuit, where the court permanently enjoined California’s unconstitutional mask law targeting federal agents.

“We conclude that § 10 of the No Vigilantes Act attempts to directly regulate the United States in its performance of… pic.twitter.com/fZNjG9QepO

— F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) April 22, 2026

California has been at the center of both legislative pushes to limit ICE’s operations in the state and demonstrations that consumed Los Angeles last summer. The Department of Justice in October 2025 arrested ten defendants on charges of violence against law enforcement in a chaotic anti-ICE demonstration at a marijuana farm in California.

Federal Democratic Legislators also pushed for a nationwide maskless bill in July 2025, led by Democratic Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey and Alex Padilla of California. The Department of Homeland Security remains shut down as Senate Democrats attempted to push for reforms on ICE that included body cameras and no face masks.

All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!