Federal judge restricts the use of tear gas at anti-ICE protests in Portland

A federal judge has restricted the use of tear gas at anti-ICE protests in Portland.

U.S. District Judge Michael Simon, a federal judge in Oregon, has imposed new limits on crowd control techniques such as tear gas to control unruly protesters outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in the city. He issued the preliminary injunction in response to an American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon lawsuit that complained of retaliation against the lawful exercise of First Amendment rights.

“The order followed a three-day hearing in which plaintiffs — including a demonstrator known for wearing a chicken costume, a married couple in their 80s, and two freelance journalists — testified that federal officers used chemical spray and projectile munitions against them,” Fox News reported.

Simon was sympathetic to their cause and cited videos of the “peaceful and nonviolent” protesters being sprayed with OC spray and other chemical irritants in his written decision.

“Plaintiffs provided numerous videos, which were received in evidence and unambiguously show DHS officers spraying OC Spray directly into the faces of peaceful and nonviolent protesters engaged in, at most, passive resistance and discharging tear gas and firing pepper-ball munitions into crowds of peaceful and nonviolent protestors,” the judge wrote. “Defendants’ conduct — physically harming protestors and journalists without prior dispersal warnings — is objectively chilling.”

The conduct of the agents was previously defended by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which said they “followed their training and used the minimum amount of force necessary to protect themselves, the public, and federal property.”

“In his ruling, Simon barred agents from using chemical or projectile munitions such as pepper balls and tear gas unless someone poses an imminent threat of physical harm. He also instructed agents not to fire munitions at the head, neck, or torso ‘unless the officer is legally justified in using deadly force against that person,'” Fox noted.

Additionally, agents are not to spray chemical irritants indiscriminately or in a way that may affect peaceful protesters or bystanders.

X users weighed in:

ADVERTISEMENT

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Leave a Reply

Latest Articles