Epstein email contradicts former Prince Andrew

Disgraced former British Royal is back in the spotlight after the latest document dump related to sex predator Jeffrey Epstein.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, was stripped of his official titles before the House Oversight Committee released 20,000 Epstein-related documents on Wednesday.

Some of the newly released emails link the former prince to Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre. One such correspondence from Epstein appeared to contradict a claim made by Andrew that a viral photo of him and Giuffre was fake.

Epstein emails suggest ex-Prince Andrew photo with Virginia Giuffre was authentic despite royal’s denials https://t.co/5ivMbDTtU6

— Fox News Entertainment (@FoxNewsEnt) November 13, 2025

“The girl has fled the country with an outstanding arrest warrant. The da (sic) after she accused others, said in writing that she has no credibility, she was never 15 years old working for me, her story made it seem like she first worked for trump at that age and was met by ghislaine maxwell,” Epstein wrote in July 2011, according to a report by Fox News.

“Total horses—, the daily mail paid her money, they admitted it, with the statement that it took money to coax out the truth.”

“Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew, as many of my employees have.”

“I have never misled you, this girl is a total liar, they (sic) authorities should check her australian immigration form… I will ask if they will cooperate – Prince people.”

Giuffre claims she was abused by Epstein three times in 2001 while she was trafficked by him and his sidekick, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Giuffre was allegedly recruited at age 16 by Maxwell when she worked at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, and launched a lawsuit against Maxwell in 2015.

Andrew had denied that the photograph was authentic.

“I have absolutely no memory of that photograph ever being taken,” he told the BBC, according to Fox.

“Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored but I don’t recollect that photograph ever being taken.”

“From the investigations that we’ve done, you can’t prove whether or not that photograph is faked or not because it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph,” he added.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!