George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley wrote Thursday that Hunter Biden’s refusal to testify during a closed-door deposition was an “unenforced error” that opened “a new potential front for prosecution.”
“Biden could have sat for his deposition and simply plead the Fifth,” Turley wrote Thursday, “but instead he opened himself up to being held in contempt of Congress by holding a public press conference outside the Capitol. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan announced Wednesday that they would initiate contempt of Congress proceedings.”
“That will force the hand of Attorney General Merrick Garland, who aggressively pursued Trump figures for contempt, including former Trump adviser Steve Bannon,” Turley wrote. “Despite some of us writing to the contrary, Bannon claimed his lawyers told him he did not have to appear before a House committee. He was swiftly charged and convicted by Garland’s prosecutors.”
The Oversight Committee sent a subpoena to Hunter Biden on Nov. 8 requiring him to appear for a deposition. Turley wrote that Hunter may “find himself indicted within a few weeks” if the law is applied to him the same as it was to Steve Bannon, who was indicted in November after being held in contempt of Congress in October for failing to comply with a subpoena.
The younger Biden said during his press conference Wednesday that his father “was not financially involved” in his business. Turley told Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Wednesday that he has “rarely seen such open contempt for Congress” and that he “can’t come up with a legal rationale for what they did.”
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Wednesday that President Joe Biden was “very familiar with what Hunter was going to say” when asked if he tried to talk his son out of defying a congressional subpoena.
“If this latest allegation is true, the president was speaking with his son about committing a potentially criminal act of contempt,” Turley wrote. “Hunter was refusing to give testimony focused not on his own role but on his father’s potential role in the alleged influence peddling.”
He wrote that Hunter may have “just tripped another wire that could seriously complicate matters not just for himself but for his father.”
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jack Smith, Fani Willis forced to defend Trump prosecutions in simultaneous testimonies - December 18, 2025
- Exclusive: Biden State Dept. appeared to ignore emails from would-be Trump assassin - December 16, 2025
- Trump DOJ seeks to block officials from testifying in Judge Boasberg probe - December 12, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
