Proud Boys trial postponed because Jan 6 committee refuses to share interview transcripts with DOJ

The Jan. 6 congressional committee and the Department of Justice (DOJ) are in a standoff over interview transcripts that to date the committee has refused to share despite having its first public hearing this month, a problem that is leading to further trial delays for Jan. 6 defendants.

Proud Boys leaders charged with seditious conspiracy are caught in the middle of the stalemate after their counsel filed a motion to continue the trial in order to review the transcripts prior to the hearing.

The DOJ sent a letter to the committee’s head investigative attorney reiterating their request for a copy of all witness interview transcripts.

“The Select Committee’s failure to grant the Department access to these transcripts complicates the Department’s ability to investigate and prosecute those who engaged in criminal conduct in relation to the January 6 attack on the Capitol,” the letter read.

“Accordingly, we renew our request that the Select Committee provide us with copies of the transcripts of all the interviews it has conducted to date.”

The letter describes the DOJ’s need to review the interviews noting that they are “not just potentially relevant to our overall criminal investigations, but are likely relevant to specific prosecutions that have already commenced.”

“Moreover, it is critical that the Department be able to evaluate the credibility of witnesses who have provided statements to multiple governmental entities in assessing the strength of any potential criminal prosecutions to ensure that all relevant evidence is considered during the criminal investigations,” the DOJ officials wrote.

“We cannot be sure that all relevant evidence has been considered without access to the transcripts that are uniquely within the Select Committee’s possession,” they added.

Committee Chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) assured reporters the interviews would be forthcoming in “due time.”

“We will work with them, but we have a report to do,” he said on Thursday. “We are not going to stop what we are doing to share information that we’ve gotten so far with the Department of Justice.”

The DOJ consented to the motion as long as the defendants are tried together and noted in their court documents that it was still unclear when the transcripts would be released.

“While we do not know precisely when copies of the transcripts will be released, if they are released as anticipated in early September 2022, the parties to this trial will face unique prejudice because the jury for the August 8 trial will have already been sworn…”

The DOJ was condemned online for not conducting its own thorough investigation and instead relying on the seemingly partisan committee’s work.

But the issue was more straightforward to others who denied that the relationship between the DOJ and Jan. 6 committee should be labeled as contentious.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Ashley Hill


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles