Candace Owens gets lawyers involved when outlet reports on ‘Australia’ comments sans critical context

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

CHECK OUT for best SWAG!

Firebrand conservative commentator Candace Owens of The Daily Wire has declared war on The Guardian over the British “news” outlet publishing what she says is a libelous headline about recent remarks she made.

During a segment of her Daily Wire show Monday about the totalitarianism creeping across the world, she drew attention specifically to the demonstrable authoritarianism being seen in Australia.

“When do we deploy troops to Australia? When do we invade Australia and free an oppressed people who are suffering under a totalitarian regime? When do we spend trillions of dollars to spread democracy in Australia?” she said.

“Australia currently — make no mistake — is a tyrannical police state. Its citizens are quite literally being imprisoned against their will. So when do we deploy?” she added.

These remarks quickly went viral and triggered a multitude of headlines and tweets basically claiming that Owens wanted the United States to invade Australia.


There was just one problem.

“Of course, I ask that in jest,” the conservative commentator continued in her remarks Monday.

This wasn’t included in any — not a single one — of the headlines published about Owens.

Nor was any context provided about the wider segment, which, unbeknownst to these “news” publishers’ readers, had included direct testimony from an Australian woman about the tyrannical conditions in the Land Down Under.

Watch the full segment yourself:

This twisting of her segment angered Owens enough that she posted a 13-minute-long video to her Instagram account Friday refuting the smear and drawing attention to one of the more influential “news” publications who’d peddled the lie.

“I’ve been trending on Twitter for the last 48 hours because The Guardian has run a headline saying that Candace Owens suggests that the U.S. should invade Australia. Completely stripped. Did not even add the sentence ‘I say that of course in jest.’ Removed from its entire context,” she said.



View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Candace Owens (@realcandaceowens)

She added that she believes The Guardian pursued this lie purposefully to preemptively stop her actual message from further spreading.

“Everyone is sharing [the monologue] in Australia. It’s going viral. So they instantly said we need to lie, because we don’t want people to watch this monologue, we don’t want people to read the article about the monologue. We need to lie. We need to get in front of the truth with a very big lie,” she explained.

And the easiest way to fool the public is through headlines, given as studies have shown that most people only read headlines and skip out on the actual story.

Only those who actually read The Guardian’s full piece learned about Owens saying she was just kidding:

(Source: The Guardian)

By including the full remark in the actual story, The Guardian can now try and argue that it did nothing wrong — that it simply hadn’t had enough space in the headline to add this extremely important part of the story.

However, Owens is confident she could still defeat them in court.

“I am going to have my lawyers send a letter … because The Guardian is actually based in the U.K., and the U.K. has very strong libel laws. You can’t just lie like that in the U.K. And I want a full retraction,” she said in her Friday video.

“To pretend that I was not joking when I quite literally said ‘I say that in jest’ is demonic. It’s satanic. It is the reason that this world is so divided. It is the reason why everywhere in the world, people are being impoverished and imprisoned by their governments who have launched a war against their own people,” she added.

One of the greatest weapons in this war, she continued, is information. By twisting the facts and controlling the flow of information, the media can control the narrative and therefore influence policy decisions.

It’s likely not a coincidence that most members of the media (regardless of country) support authoritarian coronavirus policies like mask mandates and lockdowns.

It’s also likely not a coincidence that the media have repeatedly smeared anyone who’s dared challenged this COVID orthodoxy:

By smearing Owens, however, they may have just made one mistake too many …


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles