Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
Anti-gun advocates in Virginia celebrated a victory as the Richmond City Council unanimously passed a sweeping ban on the carrying of firearms in public.
Less than one year after thousands of Second Amendment supporters rallied in front of Virginia’s state capitol building against Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam’s gun control plans, the city of Richmond voted to approve an anti-gun measure introduced last month by Mayor Levar Stoney, also a Democrat.
Effective immediately, the new law will “prohibit the possession, carrying or transportation of any firearms in any public street, road, alley, sidewalk, public right-of-way or any open public space when it is being used by, or is adjacent to, an event that requires a city permit,” WWBT-TV reported.
Richmond Police Chief Gerald Smith spoke about recent events, such as those in Kenosha, Wis., to the council before Tuesday’s vote, The Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.
“When you increase tensions with firearms, it’s just not a good mix,” Smith said. “Sooner or later, we are going to have different groups with different opinions who square off with each other. I believe this will be something we can use to increase safety in all of Richmond.”
Councilmember Kim Gray oddly claimed she was “following through on the will of the people” as she cited only 170 emails from constituents urging her to vote in favor of the measure, according to WWBT.
The law supposedly would not apply to “authorized military personnel in the performance of their lawful duties, law enforcement officers or security guards contracted or employed by the City of Richmond” and Smith noted that private gun-owning citizens would be exempt if they lived near where protests were taking place.
But Gray noted that this was not necessarily the case.
Questions about the constitutionality of the law were also reportedly addressed at the council meeting where Gray, though she supported the measure, noted the vague language.
“The actual language of the law does not provide an exemption so if I’m stepping on to the sidewalk to get into my car, then I’m potentially in violation of that rule if there is a protest adjacent to that public right of way,” said Gray. “I think the real answers in that prevention lie in leveraging our community leaders.”
“I think it’s really weak. The way it’s written is not great,” Councilwoman Kristen Larson said during the meeting as she and others voiced concerns about how the law will even be enforced in areas “adjacent” to an event.
Councilman Andreas Addison brought up the practical nature of trying to enforce a fluid protest that was making its way through different city streets where many gun owners could potentially be in violation if they happen to live in the area or be driving through at the moment.
Despite the reservations brought up by many, the unclear language and questions about the law’s potential violation of the Constitutional rights of Richmond citizens, the city council passed the measure anyway. It will likely soon be copied in other Democrat-led Virginia cities.
And if responses on social media were any indication, the mayor’s absurd gun-control measure may also soon be met with lawsuits challenging its constitutionality.
We shall see what the Supreme Court thinks of this infringement on our 2nd amendment.
— C. Bird (@CBird73936300) September 9, 2020
I have a feeling this might, could possibly be challenged in court.
— Andy Pederson (@AndyMPederson) September 9, 2020
A person is carrying a firearm and peaceably eating dinner at an outside restaurant. Along comes the ugly mob overturning tables and threatening folks. The “event” (it’s called a riot) has now found its way to the firearm. I guess the guy with the gun gets arrested. Right?
— Ken Johnson (@GoKenJohnson) September 9, 2020
How is the average citizen, with a CC permit, supposed to know that there is an event happening? Are they now required to look for “what’s happening in RVA” this week? Who’s responsibility will it be to create & maintain such a list?
— Debbie Owens (@musicgrl156) September 9, 2020
— Nick (@7Yankee) September 9, 2020
So, only bad guys will have guns?
— David (@DavidDaehlers) September 9, 2020
Severe punishment if you have to defend yourself.
— FLmope (@FLMOPE) September 9, 2020
So let me get this straight they’re supporting the first amendment by BANNING the Second Amendment. Does that make sense to protect one Civil Right but not the other?
— Crazy times in America (@JayMedina) September 9, 2020
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Are we next?!’ Kilmeade breaks down shady FBI actions, concludes Trump justified in his outrage - August 30, 2022
- Grandfather throws down with aggressive kangaroo that attacked his dogs, but who really won? - June 4, 2022
- ‘My name is Dr. Robinson’: Proud abortionist snaps at Chip Roy calling her ‘Miss’ during hearing - May 19, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.