Fmr. AG Eric Holder: Bad for U.S. to put Trump on trial after presidency

(FILE PHOTO by White House/video screenshot)

Former Attorney General Eric Holder, a frequent critic of President Donald Trump, suggested last week that the president should not be prosecuted after he leaves office.

He offered the stunning opinion while being interviewed for CNN senior political commentator David Axelrod’s podcast, “The Axe Files.”


Source: CNN

“If there is no impeachment, do you believe that he is subject to prosecution after he leaves office?” Axelrod asked him, as the relevant portion of the interview began.

“I don’t think there’s a question about that,” Holder replied. “We already have an indictment in the Southern District of New York relevant to the payoffs. Michael Cohen’s already in jail with regard to his role there. Individual 1 is the president, and it would seem to me that the next attorney general, the next president will have to make a determination.”

Fact-check: TRUE.

In disgraced former Trump attorney Michael Cohen’s sentencing memo released late last year, federal prosecutors in New York recommended he be served with “[a] substantial term of imprisonment” for committing “four distinct federal crimes,” including violating campaign finance laws and attempting to influence the outcome of the 2016 election.

“During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the right to stories –– each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 –– so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election,” the memo read.

As noted at the time by other Trump critics, “Individual 1” was the president.

Axelrod continued the interview by asking about the potential costs of prosecuting Trump.

“You came here in the post-Watergate period,” he said. “President [Gerald] Ford made a decision to pardon President [Richard] Nixon because he thought it’d be bad for the country to go through a trial of a former president. Will there be a cost to that?”

“I think there is a potential cost to the nation by putting on trial a former president,” Holder candidly admitted. “And that ought to at least be part of the calculus that goes into the determination that has to be made by the next attorney general.”

“I think we should understand what a trial of a former president would do to the nation. I think that shaped the determination that Gerald Ford made in regard to …”

Axelrod then cut him off to say, “It may have cost him his election in 1976.”

Ford’s pardon of Nixon did in fact cost him reelection.

“It has become the presidential pardon all others have been measured against, largely because of the political fallout that ensued,” The New York Times noted in a profile last year.

“Mr. Ford’s press secretary, J.F. terHorst, resigned in protest. Many Americans were outraged, while others argued Mr. Nixon suffered plenty. It was also devastating for Mr. Ford, a Republican who lost a re-election bid in 1976 to Jimmy Carter, a Democrat.”

Nevertheless, Holder to this day believes that Ford made the right decision.

It might have [cost him the election], but I think looking back I tend to think that was probably the right thing to do,” he said as the relevant portion of the interview concluded.

While the case could be made that the former AG’s perspective on the matter is insightful and even wise — especially given how much personal animosity he clearly holds for the president — it triggered outrage from the arguably less insightful and rational members of the far-left.

“You are part of what is wrong with this country. Nixon was never held accountable. George Bush was never held accountable. You suggest Trump should not be held accountable for his crimes. So, accountability is only for poor schmucks like me?” one exasperated critic wrote.

“I’ve lost any sense of belief, trust, in what you say; you exempt power from justice!!” another added.

Look at these and other exasperated responses below:

Who would have ever thought that Eric Holder, of all people, would be accused by the far-left of  being a traitor / puppet to Russian President Vladimir Putin? WOW!


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles