Outspoken left-wing Hollywood actress and “super-sciency” expert Alyssa Milano seems to believe baby heartbeats only exist if she and she alone decides that they exist.
Milano, a vocal abortion advocate, has made it clear that she fervently opposes a recently signed piece of legislation in Georgia that outlawed abortions past six weeks of pregnancy.
Dubbed the “Heartbeat Bill,” the piece of legislation signed into law by Gov. Brian Kemp on May 7 banned abortions past six weeks because it’s around the 7th or so week that an unborn baby’s heartbeat can be detected by medical equipment, according to the American Pregnancy Association.
Besides accusing the bill of being a violation of women’s alleged rights, Milano has also accused it of being improperly named. According to her unusual brand of science, it’d be far more proper and accurate to refer to bill as the “Fetal Pole Cardiac Activity Bill” …
Dear Press, stop calling them “heartbeat” bills and call them “fetal pole cardiac activity” bills https://t.co/PVDTr6pLd0
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) May 15, 2019
It’s as if she thinks it’s inaccurate to point out that babies have heartbeats …
Yet when the 46-year-old actress was pregnant with her first child back in 2011, she displayed a different attitude. At the time she shared a blog post that showed her dog resting its head on her belly. The caption read, “Do you think he can hear the baby’s heartbeat?”
She shared that blog post on Twitter:
Do you think he can hear the heartbeat? (picture)–> http://post.ly/1hZVG
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) March 4, 2011
While both the website and post have since been deleted, archives of them can still be viewed with the Wayback Machine:
It’s unclear whether she realizes that what she posted eight years ago sharply contradicts her current pro-abortion, anti-life rhetoric. Nor is it clear whether she recognizes the irony of her known habit of referring to both of her children as her “heartbeat.”
Look:
My heartbeat. #nhlallstar #HockeyIsForEveryone pic.twitter.com/ac6OuyUbr7
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) January 29, 2017
#IAmThankfulFor these children and ALL children who have touched my life throughout my journey. Children are my heartbeat. I will continue to fight for equality, opportunity, and a child’s right to a healthy, productive, happy, childhood.
Happy Thanksgiving. pic.twitter.com/D2iBAlBRAp
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) November 23, 2017
“I will continue to fight for equality, opportunity, and a child’s right to a healthy, productive, happy, childhood,” she unironically wrote during Thanksgiving 2017.
Except of course if the child — or “lump of cells,” as she’d no doubt prefer — hasn’t been born. In that case, the child apparently has no value to either her or anyone else in the pro-abortion movement.
“[D]emonstrating that personhood is in the eye of the beholder to you,” one Twitter wrote in response to Milano’s tweet from 2011. “[I]t’s only a person if you decide you want it to be. [W]anted = baby; unwanted = disposable pre-human cells or something. [A]ll feelings, no science.”
See this and other critical responses below:
demonstrating that personhood is in the eye of the beholder to you. it’s only a person if you decide you want it to be. wanted = baby; unwanted = disposable pre-human cells or something. all feelings, no science.
— jay (@trashdnscattrd) May 21, 2019
Amazing how fast the ‘caring’ ‘compassionate’ pro abortion argument falls apart when exposed for the self righteous, truly self serving pile of crap it is. You said it yourself Alyssa, heartbeat, not ‘fetal pole cardiac activity’.
— Natalie (@Natalie28611481) May 21, 2019
Self-own 8 years in the making. Classic ?
— Dirk J All Day (@DJD_Allday) May 20, 2019
And therein lies the inherent hypocrisy of the pro-choice movement. It’s a baby when it’s wanted, a fetus when it isn’t.
— J Deischer (@JulieDeischer) May 20, 2019
Nah, all the dog thought was,
“all I hear is fetal pole cardiac activity…”— Kris (@MissoulaHome) May 21, 2019
I don’t know how any woman, who actually gave birth, Milano twice, can disrespect life, so such. I call it cold blooded evil, like any murderer.
— RobinBower (@rarb221) May 20, 2019
Everyone calls it a baby when it’s in the womb until the topic of abortion is brought up then the liberals treat it completely different.
— El Cholo (@ElCholo06294191) May 20, 2019
in which @alyssa_milano demonstrates the super scientific medical assessment that determines personhood is nothing more than the feelings and desires of the born toward the unborn. wanted=baby; unwanted=disposable part of woman’s body.
— jay (@trashdnscattrd) May 21, 2019
Much of liberal thinking seems to be based on emotionally based wants versus logic and reason. Note for instance the insistence by liberals that 300-pound bearded men who feel feminine have the right to identity as women, never mind the contradicting biological facts.
From pushing for unregulated abortion to demanding that male athletes who identify as women be allowed to compete against actual women, the left has demonstrated a disturbing willingness to toss the facts out the window when it’s beneficial to their preferred narrative to do.
In the case of abortion, liberal Democrats would have you believe that every unborn baby is just a useless “lump of cells” with no life, no heartbeat and no value. Unless of course they decide that they want that baby, in which case the baby suddenly pops into existence like a thought bubble in a cartoon.
But real life isn’t a cartoon, and neither are the consequences of abortion. Whether one supports or opposes abortion, the fact remains that an unborn baby — particularly one that’s made it past six weeks — is a living, breathing human being with a heartbeat. These are the facts:
This is medically ignorant.
Now, we can argue the significance of this finding, but fetal heartbeat and fetal pole cardiac activity are synonymous. https://t.co/wxUJAp0XQg
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) May 15, 2019
Fetal cardiac activity starts at about 6 weeks, and can be picked up at that time by ultrasound. Doppler ultrasound picks up the activity and heart rate.
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) May 15, 2019
Lets note that at FOUR weeks, there are four distinct chambers of the heart.
By six weeks, this is developed about 80%, and by 8 weeks, fully developed.
Anatomically, there is little significant difference between an adult heart and this one. pic.twitter.com/mjWxSU7Fip
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) May 15, 2019
That said, there are legitimate reasons to be against heartbeat bills.
But medical or anatomical reasons are not one of them.
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) May 15, 2019
Her objection isn’t based in science, it is due to the emotions created by the words. “Heartbeat” invokes images of a living being, “fetal pole cardiac activity” is a cold, meaningless term that no one connects with emotionally. It’s a word game based in feelings, not science
— Daniel (@Sinclair_D_F) May 15, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
Vivek@bizpacreview.com
V. Saxena is a staff writer for BizPac Review with a decade of experience as a professional writer, and a lifetime of experience as an avid news junkie. He holds a degree in computer technology from Purdue University.
- Biden snubs Netanyahu thus far after big election win, but call expected ‘soon’ - November 6, 2022
- RNC chair flips CNN ‘election denier’ narrative: Dems are ‘inflation deniers… crime deniers’ - November 6, 2022
- Tudor Dixon goes scorched earth on Stephen Colbert after ‘apology’ for doubting Muslim parent is real - November 6, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
