The former long-time director of the Nobel Institute admits in his memoir released Thursday something conservative critics have known for years:
That it was a mistake to have awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama in 2009.
Geir Lundestad, who’d directed the institute for a quarter-century and was the secretary to the Nobel Committee, admitted that the committee’s unanimous decision to award the prize wasn’t based on anything the president had done, but rather as a means to help him achieve peaceful goals.
“[We] thought it would strengthen Obama and it didn’t have this effect,” he told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday.
Lundestad’s statement itself represents a break with Nobel committee tradition of secrecy.
He wrote that instead of the prize offering a boost to the president, it was met with widespread criticism, especially in the United States.
“Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake,” Lundestad wrote in excerpts of the book reported by The Associated Press. “In that sense, the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”
The AP reported:
Lundestad, who stepped down last year after 25 years as the non-voting secretary of the secretive committee, noted that Obama was startled by the award and that his staff even investigated whether other winners had skipped the prize ceremony in Oslo.
That has happened only on rare occasions, such as when dissidents were held back by their governments.
Of course, those were people who actually deserved the prize. Obama at the time he had been in office for less than a year. And while he hadn’t done anything to deserve the prize, life in the swanky White House living quarters didn’t really give him an excuse not to go to Norway.
“In the White House they quickly realized that they needed to travel to Oslo,” Lundestad wrote.
Even if Obama didn’t want to make the trip, he wasn’t about to turn down the honor — whether he’d earned it or not.
Washington Examiner columnist Ashe Schow tweeted:
Missed this in debate furor, but the Nobel committee apparently regrets giving Obama the award: http://t.co/ifa43g0Ebj
— Ashe Schow (@AsheSchow) September 17, 2015
Others took note also, beginning with Matt Drudge:
#BOOK: Nobel #director regrets giving #Obama peace prize… http://t.co/Q875kaS3Lc — Drudge Report News (@Drudge_Report_) September 16, 2015
Former Nobel boss reveals Obama didn’t want to pick up his 2009 prize and was mistake to award him. http://t.co/cRpuuwShNY #Truth
— Rebellious Son (@max_turbo88) September 17, 2015
What if the Nobel for Literature was given to someone who just signed a deal to write their 1st book. That’s the equivalent of Obama’s award — Brandi (@ItsTheBrandi) September 17, 2015
Affirmative Action In Nobel Prize-Dispensing Didn’t Work Out So Well: Director regrets 2009 Obama award http://t.co/hrC2CVP9To @instapundit
— Amy Alkon (@amyalkon) September 17, 2015
But the best observation came from Jason Price, author of “Republican Punk.”
Norway regrets giving Obama the Nobel Peace award. Kind of like how America regrets giving Obama the White House. — Jason Price (@RepublicanPunk) September 17, 2015
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.