Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr pushed back Tuesday against the idea that the government should police online speech, even as posts spread across social media celebrating the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
Speaking at Politico’s AI & Tech Summit, Carr drew a sharp distinction between speech protected under the First Amendment and the narrow categories that are not. His remarks came a day after Attorney General Pam Bondi promised to target “hate speech,” sparking widespread criticism from conservatives and even calls for her removal.
“I think you can draw a pretty clear line, and the Supreme Court has done this for decades, that our First Amendment, our free speech tradition, protects almost all speech,” Carr said. “But there are certain categories of posts, of content that are unprotected by the First Amendment. These are things like incitement to violence, those are things like fighting words.”
BONDI: “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society… We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
pic.twitter.com/8t4a7WyqL7— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) September 16, 2025
Carr stressed that such exceptions are a “small category” and said existing laws already cover them.
Given the widespread circulation of video footage showing Kirk’s assassination, Carr was asked whether social media platforms should moderate such content.
“I don’t think it’s so much that the video was horrific and violent. I think it was the act itself that was horrific and violent,” Carr said. “I think we should be giving individuals the tools to curate their own feeds and be in control of what it is that they want to see.”
Bondi, meanwhile, has sought to clarify her earlier comments made during a Monday podcast episode with host Katie Miller.
“There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society … We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech,” Bondi told Miller.
The attorney general later clarified she was referring to “hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence.”
While both Carr and Bondi have stressed that only unprotected speech or incitement to violence is legally punishable, a growing number of individuals have been fired for statements celebrating or mocking Kirk’s death. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Thursday that the department is “tracking” celebratory comments about Kirk’s murder among personnel, and the department has already begun disciplining those found in violation.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- China exploiting US-funded research to boost nuclear tech, report reveals - December 18, 2025
- China retaliates against Missouri with $50 billion lawsuit in escalating COVID battle - December 17, 2025
- ‘Absolute bulls–t’: GOP moderate nukes party leaders as Obamacare cliff nears - December 16, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
