Liberal Supreme Court justice pushes for nationwide injunctions despite once railing against them

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan once opposed the practice of district judges issuing national injunctions before siding with the court’s two other liberal justices in dissent to Friday’s ruling.

The 65-year-old justice vocally opposed the use of the procedure in 2022, during an interview at Northwestern Law School. She co-signed Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissenting opinion alongside Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson against the court blocking a nationwide injunction on President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order in a 6-3 decision.

Kagan, speaking with Northwestern Law Dean Hari Osofsky, said “It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.” The justice attacked both nationwide injunctions and “forum shopping,” where litigants only take cases to the states and judges that will support them against the federal government, saying, “there’s no political tilt to it.”

“You look at something like that and you think, that can’t be right. In the Trump years, people used to go to the Northern District of California, and in the Biden years, they go to Texas,” Kagan said during the conversation.

The Supreme Court ruled that lower courts had exceeded their authority in using a nationwide block against President Donald Trump’s January executive order restricting birthright citizenship.

The dissent, authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, stated that the rule of law is “a precept of our democracy,” and that Trump’s executive order regarding birthright citizenship has “made a ‘solemn mockery’ of our Constitution.”

The administration now seeks to “promptly file” to end birthright citizenship, an amendment “made for the babies of slaves, not meant for people trying to SCAM the system and come into the country on vacation,” according to Trump during a press conference shortly after the ruling.

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces LIST OF POLICIES that were blocked on “nationwide injunctions,” but can now PROCEED thanks to SCOTUS.

– Ending birthright citizenship
– Ending funding for sanctuary cities
– Suspending refugee resettlement
– Freezing unnecessary federal… pic.twitter.com/WFzpzxlThw

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 27, 2025

Many Democrats have opposed nationwide injunctions in the past, notably House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, when American Lawyer and District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled in favor of a ban on the sale of mifepristone, a dangerous drug allegedly used in abortion pills.

Multiple decisions by the Supreme Court this term split along 6-3 lines, including a June 18 decision to uphold a Tennessee ban on sex-change procedures for minors and Friday’s decision to allow parents to opt-out their children from LGBTQ+ storybook lessons in schools.

All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!