CNN political contributor Scott Jennings is in agreement with many on the right that we are facing a “constitutional crisis” as a result of activist judges intervening to hamstring President Donald J. Trump as he attempts to enact an agenda the American people overwhelmingly voted in favor of.
Jennings weighed in after U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly blocked Trump’s efforts to require proof of citizenship to vote in U.S. elections — the Clinton appointee said that Trump’s alleged effort to “regulate federal elections” exceeds his own authority and that the administration is attempting to “short-circuit Congress’s deliberative process by executive order.”
“I think there’s a difference between saying whether you’re complying with the law and then you have these individual district court judges setting effectively broad federal policy that is specifically reserved for the president of the United States,” Jennings said on Thursday.
Federal judge has blocked President Trump’s efforts to require proof of citizenship to register to vote
The objective is clear: nullify the election results and stall Trump until 2028. This is the REAL constitutional crisis. pic.twitter.com/7i1KhuutWI
— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) April 24, 2025
“I think we do have a constitutional crisis and it’s being caused by these judges,” he continued. “They’re not here to tell us how to spend the money. They’re not here to set broad federal policy. That is the president’s job as elected by the people. These judges are supposed to be settling discrete specific matters, not policy setting.”
Jennings argued that the left wants “individual federal judges who hate Donald Trump to tie him up for four years.
“If you want big policy questions decided, let the Supreme Court do it. But in the interim, the executive has to be allowed to govern,” he concluded.
As seen in the clip shared above, Jennings posted on X: “The objective is clear: nullify the election results and stall Trump until 2028. This is the REAL constitutional crisis.”
Here’s a sampling of responses to the story, beginning with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who characterized the actions of activist judges as “devious.”
This is so devious
— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) April 24, 2025
Why won’t your colleagues even consider your argument?
They’re all in on it.
Fcking traitors.
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) April 24, 2025
Gee, why wouldn’t Democrats want to require non-citizens to prove they can legally vote?
— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) April 24, 2025
The damage these judges are doing to this country is immeasurable.
— Michelle Maxwell (@MichelleMaxwell) April 24, 2025
I am just blown away that people don’t believe you need an ID to vote. What is happening to this country is getting so wimpy. I don’t know what federal judge has an authority to do this.
— @jewel (@jewelswill) April 24, 2025
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
Tom@bizpacreview.com
The longest-tenured writer at BizPac Review, Tom grew up in Maryland before moving to Central Florida as a young teen. It is in the Sunshine State that he honed both his passion for politics and his writing skills.
- Muslim scholar in Chicago: ‘Islam did not come to coexist’ - December 13, 2025
- New York man calls into CSPAN and rips Dem Rep a new one - December 12, 2025
- Insane ‘blue slip’ tradition nukes another highly qualified conservative US atty - December 12, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
