MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos refuted claims that President Donald Trump’s executive actions amount to a “constitutional crisis.”
Several liberal legal scholars argued in The New York Times on Monday that Trump’s efforts to reform the federal government have caused a “constitutional crisis,” with one characterizing the president’s actions as “lawless.” After “Morning Joe” host Mika Brzezinski read from the NYT article and asked for his take, Cevallos urged caution when uttering “constitutional crisis,” asserting that executive orders alone cannot meet that threshold.
WATCH:
“I think we need to be careful with the term constitutional crisis because, as I define it, that would be a situation where the Constitution doesn’t have an answer and there is a pressing conflict. The flurry of executive orders, the chaos, that I think doesn’t get us to crisis yet. It is irritating for the courts,” Cevallos told Brzezinski. “It is challenging. It could lead to a serious problem if, as you said, they become too congested with dealing with these orders. The crisis occurs, and we’ve already talked about it, at the moment when there is a court order and the president or the administration refuses to follow it, because historically, we don’t really have a clear answer for what to do in that situation.”
“On the first half of it, issuing a bunch of executive orders, not only do we know that the courts can handle it, they already did this back in 2017. This is the same MO. The Trump administration then would just fire out executive orders. It felt like they weren’t even spell-checking them,” he continued. “And then they would let the courts prune them like the proverbial bonsai tree, or they would just withdraw them and go back to the drawing board. It’s probably not the most efficient way of doing it. It’s chaotic, as you said. It’s problematic.”
Several Democratic lawmakers have accused Trump and Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chair Elon Musk of pushing the country into a “constitutional crisis” with their efforts to cut wasteful spending and shrink the size of the federal government.
The Trump administration is appealing injunctions imposed by federal judges including those pertaining to DOGE, Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order terminating birthright citizenship and the president’s order freezing foreign aid, among others following litigation by Democrats and unions representing government employees.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Fani Willis comes apart at seams - December 17, 2025
- Ex-DNC chair lectures about inclusivity after party platform under his watch excluded men - December 17, 2025
- Vince Coglianese says Nancy Pelosi only pretending Democrats don’t want to impeach Trump - December 16, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
