The Supreme Court allowed Honolulu’s lawsuit against oil companies to move forward on Monday.
The justices declined without explanation to hear several energy companies’ challenge to a Hawaii Supreme Court decision rejecting their effort to dismiss the case.
The City and County of Honolulu, later joined by the Honolulu Board of Water Supply, sued the companies in 2020, alleging their fossil fuel products harmed the region by contributing to climate change.
“This case presents the Court with its only foreseeable opportunity in the near future to decide a dispositive question that is arising in every climate-change case: whether federal law precludes state-law claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate,” the companies argued in their petition filed last year.
Manufacturers’ Accountability Project (MAP) special counsel Phil Goldberg said selling energy is “not a liability inducing event and, if it becomes one, it will make energy much more expensive for all of us.”
“The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear this case at this time is unfortunate because it prolongs litigation when there is general agreement that state law—in this instance, Hawaii’s—cannot govern, let alone impose liability on, the manufacture, sale and promotion of energy around the world,” Goldberg said in a statement. “We are confident that when Hawaii courts consider these claims, they will join the many courts that have already found that this climate litigation has no legal or factual foundation.”
Executive Director of the Antonin Scalia Law School’s Center for the Study of the Administrative State Adam White said cases like this “will only continue to proliferate as more and more state officials try to make themselves national energy policy czars.”
“I hope that the Court will hear the issue someday, for the sake of constitutional accountability and the public interest,” White wrote in a statement.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jack Smith, Fani Willis forced to defend Trump prosecutions in simultaneous testimonies - December 18, 2025
- Exclusive: Biden State Dept. appeared to ignore emails from would-be Trump assassin - December 16, 2025
- Trump DOJ seeks to block officials from testifying in Judge Boasberg probe - December 12, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
