DEI violates 14th Amendment

Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author.

Unless your last name is Pelosi, Newsome, or Harris, it’s likely that you have concluded that “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” clearly violates the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. In short, it is contemporary wording for “reverse discrimination.”

The Biden-Harris administration proved to be the greatest champion for DEI perhaps ever. In many cases, better-qualified candidates were passed over in favor of DEI options. In some instances, such as Donald Trump’s Butler, PA assassination attempt, it almost proved fatal.

MAGA members, as well as Republicans and Democrats outside of the movement, considered Kamala Harris the poster child for diversity, equity, and inclusion. While sporting a political record that could be described as “mediocre at best,” she failed to win a single delegate when running for the presidency in 2019. Her VP selection fulfilled a promise made by Joe Biden
to select a woman of color. It can be concluded that her selection was made in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Meanwhile, better-qualified candidates, from Vice President of the United States to high-ranking jobs in corporate America to $60,000 per year, mid-level management candidates, have taken the brunt of this ill-advised, if not illegal standard! Aggrieved Americans, often passed over in favor of candidates more in sync with the Biden administration’s preference for
diversity, equity, and inclusion, are sounding off. The incoming Trump administration is apparently heeding their cries of “reverse discrimination.” Expect some major retribution in the coming years, if not months!

Biden Administration’s DEI Wastes are Staggering

When Americans learned that the Biden administration was okay with sex change operations for illegal migrants, something snapped. Nobody could believe that tax dollars were being spent in such a casual, irresponsible manner. Incoming President Trump has responded with the “D.O.G.E.” This carefully constructed brainchild of Elon Musk will root out government waste. Musk will be joined by former presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, who had previously proposed “eliminating 75 % of the federal bureaucracy.”

Only now is it becoming evident how much money the Biden-Harris administration has squandered on a clearly unconstitutional position. Now that America has fired them, the ill-advised concept should go quietly into the night. Or should it? An increasing number of voices believe that simple termination may not be sufficient. Could criminally prosecuting those in the administration and bureaucracy who advanced and facilitated DEI be on tap? Especially when considering the number of Americans currently homeless and hungry!

The Bottom of the Food Chain

Heterosexual males found themselves at the bottom of the food chain during Joe Biden’s Presidency. Joe Biden has always been sympathetic to the LGBTQ cause. Kamala Harris, ever the opportunist, seconded the motion. Soon, we were seeing a division in America like never before! And for good reason! Pro-LGBTQ advocates in management roles, especially in the “pick collar world,” were openly discriminating against heterosexuals. All in the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

Americans enthusiastically talked about a “national divorce,” making it clear that they did not want to raise their children in such an America. Their universal conclusion amounted to, “When you give them an inch, they’ll take a mile!” Then came November 5th. It became painfully obvious that LGBTQ proponents, and Marxists, the central players in the DEI movement, were
decidedly in the minority.

Historians will revisit this time in America decades in the future. It will be remembered that an errant SCOTUS decision opened the door for a reaction not expected. When by a 5-4 decision the court determined that LGBTQ members constituted a protected class, the subsequent fallout was unexpected. Suddenly America was experiencing not merely increased tolerance for LGBTQ citizens, but the movement’s yearning to advance their cause. Many of its members sought legal means to ensure that their preferences became law.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause prevents discrimination based on “race, color, creed, sex, and national origin.” Religious freedom has always been a right in America. When Justice Neal Gorsuch surprisingly voted with the liberal minority to make LGBTQ a protected class, conservatives were shocked. Since that time, the Coloradoan has expressed remorse. Ruth Bader Ginsberg has since been replaced by Amy Coney Barrett. Expect the question to resurface during the next four years.

A correction is imminent.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles