2024 landscape different from 1861

Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author.

2024 is different when compared to 1861. 2024 differences are not sectional. They are ideological. One side wants to return to a safer, more familiar time in American history. The other side looks to step into the unknown, hoping to bring about an order that greatly simplifies matters for those on top of the food chain.

Americans on both sides of the aisle are gradually realizing that a deal was cut by the Democrat establishment and the Bernie Sanders contingent. It went somewhat like this: “Biden will be the nominee, but the agenda will be ours.”

With their hand chosen VP included in the package, they gradually began implementing the agenda. Biden’s decline was increasingly noticeable. Still, party bosses believed that he would have an easier time gaining re-election than any other option. The Trump-Biden debate forced their hand.

In the eyes of the Trump faithful, this election simply cannot be lost. They will either win the election or they’ll find another way. As far as they are concerned, Democrats are utilizing a weaponized bureaucracy and a corrupt, complicit legacy media to further their agenda.

Amazingly, the FBI came clean on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. In the eyes of MAGA members, admission of guilt does not change the fact that they did it. They consider any person satisfied to live in a country where the FBI can manipulate and withhold information, and a media that allows them to get away with it, is not worthy of being called a fellow American.

A Totally Different Value System

The MAGA members will simply not submit to a Marxist government. It will either go away or there will be a war! And if there is war, it will be a war for the ages. “Blue state” Americans are not going to take on “red state” Americans in an old fashioned, brass knucks brawl! They are anything but stupid! They sense the fury seethed by the other side. Alternatives are welcomed.

That both sides hold contempt for the other is painfully apparent. After evaluating their paradigm differences on governments role in our lives, it’s understandable.

“Faith based, national populism versus “secular, global socialism.” The latter knows that the only way that they can win is through the legal system. This they are attempting to do. If their media accomplices are successful in effectively “gaslighting” enough well-intentioned Americans, they might pull it off.

Even if they did, it would be a hollow victory. Unrest that turns into violence isn’t on any wish list!

Could a Deal Precede Realignment?

Perhaps there is an easier way. If friendly, welcoming landing spots throughout North America could be introduced to Americans and Canadians, possibilities become endless. Those looking for the perfect place to call home start with a country that speaks English as its first language.

An overall realignment of North America is long overdue. Canada has 39 million people in an area greater than both the United States and China. It has or has access to, almost one-half of the planet’s known fresh water. Water is expected to be the “gold” of the latter part of this century.

The Northeast and the Pacific Northwest are attractive parts of North America. Currently, there are successionist movements underway in both. What if American Agriculture, Energy and Manufacturing companies funneled support to help these two causes gain their independence? Why would they do this? Simple! To “relieve” the United States of “blue” Senate seats.

Cascadia and P.I.N.E.

Cascadia is “British Columbia west of the 120^th parallel of longitude. It would be joined by the state of Washington, west of the 120^th parallel and Oregon, west of the 120^th and north of Coos county.

“Cascadia” is about the size of Texas and New Mexico combined, with a population” just south of 15 million. Probably its most notable resource (outside of its uncommon beauty), is its hydroelectric potential, surpassed only by Brazil.

British Columbia is probably the most progressive province in Canada. As American states go, most of Washington and Oregon’s conservative members live east of the 120^th parallel. The result: “a nation in the western hemisphere that would later be described as “a physically majestic Netherlands.”

The P.I.N.E. (Peoples Initiative of New England) movement is different and much more complicated. 93% of the population of the six American states and four Canadian provinces can trace their lineage back to England, Scotland, Ireland, Northern Ireland and Wales. It is the least ethnically diverse part of North America. The combined area is roughly the size of Texas with a population identical to Florida’s.

Separation from the U.S. would translate to separation from the 14^th Amendment. Many “PINERS” want to immigrate siblings from overcrowded England. MSNBC called the P.I.N.E. a “white supremacist group.”

Capitalizing on the Energy of the Movement

Both groups of Americans and Canadians see themselves as “individualistic.” Most consider themselves non-conformists.” Founding a new country dedicated to their core values is delightfully refreshing! Especially if both new countries are promised seats on the Arctic Council.

Although Ottawa would howl, it would come together nicely. Alberta and Saskatchewan would join the U.S. as separate states, bringing the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories with them. Quebec would declare her independence. California would split. Remaining Washington and Oregon countries would complete “Greater Idaho.”

More realignments would be on the horizon. But valuable time could be bought. The main goal of a second Trump presidency would be to eliminate most of the federal bureaucracy.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!