Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged that the federal government headed by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris pressured Facebook to censor the free speech of Americans.
In the latest pulling back of the curtain to expose the censorship regime’s coordination with Big Tech to use corporations as a workaround in their war on the First Amendment, the Facebook co-founder said that the company was bullied by the feds to clamp down on the free flow of information online, especially regarding COVID and Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Zuckerberg revealed what many already knew in a Monday letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in which he admitted the government bullying and said that he regretted not being more outspoken about it before now.
BREAKING: Mark Zuckerberg just admitted to working with Biden/Harris admin to censor Americans.
He either admitted to this because:
1. He’s being honorable
2. He’s done with the Dem party
3. He’s getting ahead of a whistleblowerEither way this is a VERY HARD letter to write. pic.twitter.com/y64cOQjY15
— Patrick Bet-David (@patrickbetdavid) August 27, 2024
“In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree,” the letter read.
“Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including COVID-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken.”
“I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again,” the tech titan pledged.
Zuckerberg also admitted that Facebook “temporarily demoted” the bombshell about the Hunter Biden “laptop from hell” in the weeks before the 2020 election, censoring a story that could have altered the trajectory of history.
“It’s since been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story,” he wrote. “We’ve changed our policies and processes to make sure this doesn’t happen again – for instance, we no longer demote things in the U.S. while waiting for the fact-checkers.”
He also addressed the role of “Zuckerbucks” in the 2020 election, money that was as instrumental in engineering Joe Biden’s win as the quashing of his son’s depravity and corruption was implemented.
“They were designed to be non-partisan – spread across urban, rural, and suburban communities,” he wrote. “Still, despite the analyses I’ve been showing otherwise, I know that some people believe this work benefited one party over the other. My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another – or to even appear to be playing a role. So I don’t plan on making a similar contribution this cycle.”
Social media censorship has been nearly as important a tool to the Democrats as leveraging coercive state power against their enemies and in a normal environment, Zuckerberg’s letter would be a huge scandal but will receive little coverage from the Biden-Harris regime’s media partners.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Trump trolls Biden, Obama in savage new plaques added to White House Presidential Walk of Fame - December 18, 2025
- Dems dutifully dumped on Trump’s big primetime speech, but was it effective? - December 18, 2025
- Chip Roy accuses his party of buying MTG’s vote: ‘That’s the kind of sh*t that keeps happening’ - December 17, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
