The Colorado Capitol removed language from its webpage Wednesday banning “political” apparel after being threatened with legal action for ‘arbitrarily’ enforcing the rule, according to the legal group representing the case.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) sent a letter to the Colorado sergeants-at-arms in July demanding the rule be changed after Jeffrey Hunt, a professor at the Colorado Christian University, was removed from the Capitol Senate gallery for wearing a shirt displaying “Pro-Life U” in reference to the college during a vote on abortion-related bills. FIRE announced Wednesday that the Capitol gallery rule prohibiting “pins or apparel expressing political statements” has since been removed from the Capitol’s website.
“I am thrilled at this outcome,” said Hunt. “Now, Coloradans are free to share their voices, particularly at the state Capitol, where the work of the people takes place.”
VICTORY: Colorado officials kicked @jeffhunt out of the Senate gallery for wearing a Pro-Life U sweatshirt because it was a “political statement.”
Thanks to FIRE’s advocacy, state House and Senate leadership have rescinded the ban on “political” apparel in the Capitol galleries. pic.twitter.com/8DB2BOPaIU
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) August 14, 2024
The July letter threatened the sergeants with a lawsuit, alleging that the ban was unconstitutional for limiting speech and expression in a government building and that the rule was applied in a “viewpoint-discriminatory manner.”
“The Capitol Gallery Rule’s ban on ‘political’ pins and apparel violates the First Amendment,” the letter stated. “When the government seeks to silence political expression, it bears a heavy burden to justify its censorship. The Capitol Gallery Rule cannot meet that high bar.”
Weeks before the May incident, a group wearing pro-gun control shirts stating “Angels Against Gun Violence” was allowed access to the same gallery without issue, according to the letter.
“Jeff should have been allowed to express his opinions in a non-disruptive manner, but the rule was overbroad and gave officials too much leeway to arbitrarily enforce the ban,” Josh Bleisch, an attorney for FIRE, said in a statement. “Now that the ban is no more, Coloradans can wear a political shirt where politics happens.”
FIRE argued that the Capitol’s rule prohibiting disruptive behavior in the gallery was sufficient and made the ban on silent political expression unnecessary.
The Colorado sergeants-at-arms and Senate did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Harvard seeking way to silence students who recorded Larry Summers’ Epstein apology - December 17, 2025
- Maryland school board re-ups policy letting boys in girls bathrooms - December 11, 2025
- Trump admin sues Minneapolis schools over race-based hiring practices - December 11, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
