The College Board recently made changes to the Advanced Placement (AP) tests that have resulted in more student test-takers receiving higher scores, according to the Wall Street Journal.
The AP tests’ scoring changes involve replacing a panel of experts with a large-scale data analysis to determine skills students learned throughout the courses, the WSJ reported. Educators and test-prep companies are skeptical of the changes, alleging it is another form of grade inflation and a way to increase College Board’s business.
“It is hard to argue with the premise of AP, that students who are talented and academically accomplished can get a head start on college,” Jon Boeckenstedt, Oregon State University’s vice provost of enrollment, told the WSJ. “But I think it’s a business move.”
The AP tests score students on a one-to-five scale, with three being the lowest possible passing score, according to the WSJ. For popular exams like AP U.S. History, the proportion of students who received a three or higher was significantly lower in 2023 than in 2024.
The College Board has lobbied state legislators for years, asking that public universities offer credit to students who pass the exams, and have been successful in 35 states, according to the WSJ. Students who pass the AP exams can be placed into more rigorous courses, or have requirements waived, as freshmen.
Trevor Packer, the head of the College Board’s AP program stated that the changes in scoring formats are not an attempt to lure in more test-takers, according to the WSJ.
“We want to be fair and precise in giving students the credit they have earned, “Packer told the WSJ. “This is not a matter of: Does this raise or lower the scores.”
Mark Reindl, who teaches AP U.S. History in California, found that 76% of his students passed the exam this year while no more than 40% had in previous years, the WSJ reported. He supports the changes as being beneficial to students earning college credit, but said that it won’t affect the standards for his class.
“That was an eye-opener,” Reindl told the WSJ.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Dem mayor’s hand-picked school board president resigns after just a week over antisemitic social media posts - November 1, 2024
- Judge rules anti-Israel group can sue universities over alleged free speech violations - October 31, 2024
- Catholic hospital forced to provide emergency abortions after blue state AG’s lawsuit - October 30, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
