Former President Donald Trump and seven other defendants in his Georgia racketeering case requested review Monday of a judge’s decision not to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
Judge Scott McAfee ruled Friday that Willis could stay on the case against Trump if Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade stepped down, despite calling their actions a “tremendous lapse in judgment” and questioning whether they testified truthfully about their relationship. The defendants asked McAfee Monday to grant a certificate of immediate review allowing them to appeal his ruling, writing that the disqualification of Nathan Wade “is insufficient to cure the appearance of impropriety the Court has determined exists.”
“Whether District Attorney Willis and her Office are permitted to continue representing the State of Georgia in prosecuting the Defendants in this action is of the utmost importance to this case, and ensuring the appellate courts have the opportunity to weigh in on these matters pre-trial is paramount,” the defendants’ motion states. “As noted, should such review not occur until after any trial in this case and these decisions were ultimately reversed on appeal, such reversal would likely require the retrial of every convicted defendant without any additional showing of error or prejudice.”
To appeal the order denying disqualification prior to trial, the defendants must obtain a certificate of immediate review within 10 days from the date of the order.
Even if Judge McAfee issues a certificate, the Georgia Court of Appeals could still decline to hear the case.
— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) March 18, 2024
Trump co-defendant Michael Roman initially filed the motion to disqualify Willis on Jan. 8, alleging she financially benefited from appointing Wade when he took her on vacations using money earned from his position.
“The motion notes that the Court found that Willis’ actions created an appearance of impropriety and an ‘odor of mendacity’ that lingers in this case, but it nonetheless refused to dismiss the case or disqualify her,” Trump’s lead defense counsel Steve Sadow said in a statement. “The motion further notes that the Court found Georgia case law lacks controlling precedent for the standard for disqualification of a prosecuting attorney for forensic misconduct. For these reasons among others, the Court’s Order is ripe for pretrial appellate review.”
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jack Smith, Fani Willis forced to defend Trump prosecutions in simultaneous testimonies - December 18, 2025
- Exclusive: Biden State Dept. appeared to ignore emails from would-be Trump assassin - December 16, 2025
- Trump DOJ seeks to block officials from testifying in Judge Boasberg probe - December 12, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
