George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley compared in a Tuesday blog post Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland’s effort to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the ballot to then-New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s effort to ban Big Gulps.
Raskin told CNN host Dana Bash on Monday that he was working with Democratic Reps. Eric Swalwell of California and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz of Florida to revive legislation that would declare Trump an insurrectionist and disqualify him from running for office under the 14th Amendment after the Supreme Court reversed Colorado’s Supreme Court ruling blocking him from the ballot. Turley compared Raskin’s effort to revive the legislation to Bloomberg’s 2012 effort to ban sodas larger than 16 ounces from being sold at several locations.
“For these members, citizens cannot be trusted with this power as Trump tops national polls as the leading choice for the presidency,” Turley wrote on his blog. “It is the political version of the Big Gulp law, voters like consumers have to be protected against their own unhealthy choices.”
Bloomberg’s ban was struck down in a 2013 court decision that ruled that the Board of Health lacked the authority to enforce the measure. The New York State Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s ruling in 2014.
Turley said Raskin’s bill would target not just Trump, but other Republicans, as well.
It appears citizens cannot be trusted with this power as Trump tops national polls as the leading choice for the presidency. It is the constitutional version of the Big Gulp law, voters like consumers must be protected against their own unhealthy choices https://t.co/ssMgjP0HMT
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) March 5, 2024
“Raskin’s participation in this effort is crushingly ironic. In 2016, he sought to block certification of the 2016 election under the very same law as violent protests were occurring before the inauguration,” Turley wrote in his post. “The prior bills were sweeping and included members who did not engage in any violent acts (no member has been charged with such violence or even incitement) but merely opposed certification.”
“Raskin is succeeding in one respect. He and his colleagues have bulldozed any moral high ground after January 6th,” Turley wrote. “Most of us condemned the riot on that day as a desecration of our constitutional process. Yet, the Democrats have responded with the most anti-democratic efforts to prevent voters from exercising their rights in the upcoming election.”
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Police chief who groveled after discussing ‘East African crime’ panders to Somalis again - December 17, 2025
- Ilhan Omar whines about ICE operations in Minneapolis - December 17, 2025
- ‘It’s all bullsh*t’: Tim Walz goes on anti-Second Amendment rant - December 17, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
