SURVEY: Americans support merit-based college admission practices

Campus Reform, Jared Gould

With the Supreme Court recently banning the use of affirmative action in college admissions, some Americans are exploring alternative approaches to diversify university campuses, with some even supporting a shift toward income-based admissions.

A recent Intelligent.com survey involving 1,095 American respondents reveals that 1 in 3 Americans support the idea of college admissions taking an applicant’s socioeconomic status into account.

Support for using socioeconomic background hinges on the idea that lower-income students face greater educational challenges, lessening a poorer applicant’s chance of being admitted into college.

[RELATED: ANALYSIS: Fabricated media narrative fuels affirmative action outrage]

The use of merit, however, still outweighed alternative admission practices, as the following chart from the survey shows:

image

Those who do not believe that an applicant’s socioeconomic status should be considered wrote in, expressing the following: “I believe admissions should be based on achievement” and “For financial aid, yes, socioeconomic status should be considered, but admissions should be offered based on academic performance.”

But time will tell if college administrators will adopt merit-based admission practices.

For now, it seems more likely that neither law nor majority American opinion will stop colleges from using race as a factor.

[RELATED: Article argues for ways to get around potential affirmative action bans in anticipation of SCOTUS rulings]

In its statements following the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling, Harvard implied that it would skirt the Court’s decision, as Campus Reform reported in June.

ADVERTISEMENT

Anthony Monaco, president of Tufts University, told The Boston Globe in May 2022 that his administration was strategizing to “continue diversifying elite college campuses” and “have reaffirmed their commitment to diversity.”

Former Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz also highlighted this issue in a recent column for The Hill, as previously reported. Ahead of the Court’s ruling, he pointed out that universities were strategizing to racial diversity campuses by setting what they refer to as “targets,” which effectively function as quotas.

These targets may act as floors for applicants of color and as ceilings for Asian Americans, Dershowitz noted.

For more stories like this, follow Jared Gould on Twitter.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles