Two pro-life pregnancy centers filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the state of Vermont over a bill passed by the state Legislature that “censors” their ability to provide resources to pregnant women.
The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a freedom of religion and free speech advocacy group that provides legal counsel, filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, which operates two pregnancy care facilities in Vermont, alleging that state Senate Bill 37 restricts these centers ability to advertise pro-life services, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that the bill violates the First and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution by prohibiting these centers from offering services like counseling without medical licenses.
“That law impedes the ability of pro-life pregnancy centers to continue providing help and support to Vermont women and families in two ways: First, it censors the centers’ ability to advertise their free services (Advertising Prohibition),” the lawsuit states. “Second, it precludes centers from offering non-medical services, information, and counseling unless provided by a licensed health care provider (Provider Restriction).”
“False and misleading advertising by centers that do not offer or refer clients for abortion is of special concern to the State because of the time-sensitive and constitutionally protected nature of the decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy,” the bill states.
“So the law is specifically designed to target pro-life pregnancy centers and it does that by limiting its application to centers that do not provide or refer for abortions,” Payne told the DCNF. “So, for example, Planned Parenthood could have a non-licensed counselor discuss a woman’s pregnancy options with her but a pro-life pregnancy center could not have the same counselor do the same thing.”
The DCNF also interviewed Jean Marie, the executive director of Branches Pregnancy Resource Center, one of the facilities suing Vermont. Marie, a human trafficking survivor who found help at a pregnancy care center, told the DCNF that she “would be a dead woman” if centers were not available to offer her free pregnancy resources.
“And so with these restrictions that this law has put on my center, to know that if the restrictions had passed nine years ago, I would be a dead woman because of the fact that the ability for pregnancy service not to be free to service women and offer the support that they need without the fear of the unjust government punishment,” Marie told the DCNF.
The office of Vermont’s attorney general did not immediately respond to a DCNF request for comment.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Drugs are helping me to not go crazy’: Blue-City addicts say they’re locked in a cycle of abuse - July 26, 2023
- Pregnancy resource centers sue Vermont over law that ‘censors’ pro-life services - July 26, 2023
- Riders are dropping dead on California public transit as drug crisis escalates - July 25, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
