Wired magazine declines to recommend Ring doorbells due to racial profiling

A prominent technology magazine was ridiculed by Twitter users after one of its writers declined to recommend the popular Ring video doorbell to readers because of a feature allowing owners of the device to send videos of suspicious activity directly to law enforcement.

In the Wired magazine article on the Ring doorbells, the author states that the product is “affordable and ubiquitous, but homeowners shouldn’t be able to act as vigilantes,” suggesting that an endorsement would be akin to enabling racial profiling.

According to Wired, the Amazon-owned product, “also allows Ring owners to send videos they’ve captured with their Ring video doorbell cameras and outdoor security cameras to law enforcement. This is a feature unique to Ring—even Nextdoor removed its Forward to Police feature in 2020, which allowed Nextdoor users to forward their own safety posts to local law enforcement agencies. If a crime has been committed, law enforcement should obtain a warrant to access civilian video footage.”

“Multiple members of WIRED’s Gear team have spoken to Ring over the years about this feature. The company has been clear it’s what customers want, even though there’s no evidence that more video surveillance footage keeps communities safer. Instead, Neighbors increases the possibility of racial profiling. It makes it easier for both private citizens and law enforcement agencies to target certain groups for suspicion of crime based on skin color, ethnicity, religion, or country of origin,” the article says.

Reactions to the publication’s silly racial paranoia and siding with criminals over law-abiding Ring owners were a mixture of incredulity and scorn.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ring has taken steps to address the concerns about its relationship with law enforcement. In 2021, the company released the results of a nearly two-year-long audit with the Policing Project at New York University’s School of Law,” Wired reported. “Ring made changes to policies, including making Requests for Assistance public, making NPSS a local service, and introducing new community guidelines when it comes to posting. For example, you’re now only allowed to report facts, not feelings. You’re no longer allowed to post footage of people just because you feel squirmy about them.”

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Chris Donaldson

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles