Bowling Green State University (BGSU) grades job applicants on their commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) despite touting its commitment to free expression, according to its website.
The Ohio university uses the statements to determine whether applicants “support the University’s mission and values” that include increasing “inclusion and belonging” on campus, according to the rubric website. However, the school also touted its Freedom of Expression policy on the rubric website and clarified that it is “not looking for applicants to express any specific ideologies.”
“It rings ironic for Bowling Green State University to highlight its free expression policy while explaining its diversity statement policy,” National Association of Scholars fellow John Sailer told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Diversity statements don’t just violate academic freedom. Legal scholars from across the political spectrum have argued that they violate the First Amendment.”
While explaining the diversity statement requirement, BGSU’s website makes reference to its Freedom of Expression policy, noting “BGSU strictly prohibits infringement of First Amendment rights.”
If so, they should obviously simply prohibit DEI statements. pic.twitter.com/tme377TdGU
— John Sailer (@JohnDSailer) April 18, 2023
While search committee members are warned to not “score someone poorly because you do not share their perspective,” the rubric shows that candidates are scored lower for providing vague or minimal details about their DEI commitments. Diversity statements are weighed as either “lacking evidence,” providing “some evidence” or providing “optimal evidence” about the applicants’ knowledge, awareness and application of DEI.
“We are not looking for applicants to express any specific ideologies, we are trying to understand how or if at all equity, diversity, and/or inclusion within the professional setting have shaped your perspective on the issue,” the website reads, later clarifying that its DEI commitment “is not aimed at producing ideological conformity.”
Sailer, however, told the DCNF that “it’s not hard to see why” diversity statements could violate applicants’ First Amendment rights.
“The term ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ often connotes a substantive set of social and political views,” he explained. “Yet, Bowling Green’s own diversity statement rubric very clearly rewards candidates who espouse DEI as a core value, and it at least implicitly punishes candidates who are skeptical of DEI policies in higher education. It’s an invitation to police job candidates’ social and political views. That isn’t fixed by vague references to ‘free expression.’”
A Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) survey published in February found that half of university professors believe diversity statements are an “ideological litmus test that violates academic freedom.” Multiple Republican-led states including Utah, Florida and West Virginia have introduced bills that would ban the use of diversity statements during the hiring process in higher education.
BGSU did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.
All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
