Common car safety feature has a massive, dangerous flaw

John Hugh DeMastri, DCNF

The majority of cars that utilize pedestrian automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems to automatically stop cars in the event a driver does not react to a pedestrian perform significantly worse at night, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).

The IIHS tested 23 midsize SUVs and small pickups, 19 of which scored sufficiently high to receive an IIHS Top Safety Pick during daytime tests, but only 11 scored that well in nighttime tests, according to a press release. Three-quarters of pedestrian traffic fatalities occur at night, the IIHS reported.

”It’s discouraging that so many midsize SUVs and small pickups perform poorly in the nighttime test because research suggests these types of vehicles are more dangerous to pedestrians,” said IIHS President David Harkey in the press release. The referenced research is a June 2020 IIHS study that concluded that SUVs were more lethal than other types of cars at a variety of speeds, based on a sample of 79 Michigan crashes that the researchers determined was “small and limited,” necessitating a larger study.

Only four of the 23 models tested so far in IIHS’s new nighttime pedestrian autobrake test performed well enough to earn the highest rating of superior.

Full ratings: https://t.co/64WmmC9YqR pic.twitter.com/5Ed0quVDsw

— IIHS (@IIHS_autosafety) August 30, 2022

The IIHS tested the ability of a car to stop before hitting a pedestrian in 2 common scenarios, a test where cars going at 12 miles-per-hour (mph) and 25 mph hit a pedestrian crossing the street, and a test where cars going at 25 mph and 37 mph hit a pedestrian walking along the edge of a travel lane, according to the IIHS.

Toyota’s Tacoma pickup truck, which the IIHS gave a “no credit” rating, does not possess a system capable of detecting pedestrians at night, Toyota told the Daily Caller News Foundation in a statement. The Toyota Highlander and Camry were two of just four cars to receive a “superior” rating, and had much more advanced technology, Toyota told the DCNF.

“While we cannot comment on specific 3^rd party testing or rating strategies we can say that Toyota was one of the first companies to make such safety technologies standard, and we have a long history of deploying active safety technologies and driver support systems that align with our stated goals to help reduce and/or eliminate traffic accidents,” Toyota said.

Volkswagen, on the other hand, had all three of its tested cars receive a “basic” rating, but stressed in a statement to Reuters that all three cars used radar alone, as opposed to a combination of radar and camera, like some other cars tested.

“We are confident that the next versions of the Atlas, Atlas Cross Sport and Tiguan should perform better because they fuse camera and radar sensors and will hopefully achieve an Advanced rating,” the company said in a statement to Reuters.

An IIHS spokesperson told the DCNF that while radar systems do not rely on light levels and are thus unaffected by ambient light conditions, most vehicles use either only a camera system or a camera in combination with radar to accurately identify pedestrians.

Pedestrian fatalities have risen 80% since they hit their lowest point in 2009, with 7,342 deaths per year as of 2021, according to Reuters.

Volkswagen did not respond to a request for comment by the DCNF.

For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!