CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store and WeThePeople.wine for holiday gifts and awesome snarky swag!
Despite many Americans now chalking up masks to a thing of the past, The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) convened a committee on Thursday to go a different direction and plans to make its indoor mask mandate permanent.
“Permanent means indefinite. It doesn’t necessarily mean permanent,” OHA’s medical director for communicable diseases and immunizations Dr. Paul Cieslak said according to KATU.
The Rules Advisory Committee (RAC) is comprised of community stakeholders including representatives from faith-based organizations and the hospitality sector. Their purpose is to discuss the contents and potential impacts of the “indefinitely permanent” proposed rule.
INDOOR MASKING IN OREGON — It’s likely here to STAY.
Today, @OHAOregon worked with stakeholders (like those in the restaurant industry, business assoc., etc.) to discuss making the current indoor mask mandate permanent.#LiveOnK2 pic.twitter.com/r0gkNnWfsi
— Genevieve Reaume (@GenevieveReaume) December 3, 2021
“We can repeal it as well, but we are only allowed to have a temporary rule for 180 days, and anything that goes beyond 180 days, we cannot extend it temporarily, it’s either adopt it formally or let it [go],” Cieslak explained.
Yes — that may sound alarming. Here’s what you need to know about it:
-The current rule is temporary. It can’t be in place more than 180 days.
-Making the rule permanent allows the state to keep the rule.
-The rule can be repealed.#LiveOnK2 pic.twitter.com/qEZAeExxu8— Genevieve Reaume (@GenevieveReaume) December 3, 2021
The two-hour meeting OHA had with RAC concluded the committee’s involvement with the rule-making process, although stakeholders may still choose to make public comments when the rule is formally proposed.
And again, for those who missed it, yes, if this becomes a formal rule it’s technically a permanent rule… but it can be repealed. And stakeholders did bring up today how having an end date may be good. There is SO much discussion to be had before any rule is adopted.
— Genevieve Reaume (@GenevieveReaume) December 3, 2021
The potential implementation of a permanent mask mandate generated some clearly tongue-in-cheek responses indicating how easy it will be for Oregonians to get their freedoms back once permanent rules is in place.
People are overreacting. The government routinely gives up power once they have it.
— Vir Androprepe 白左 2SLGBTQQIABIPOC+ ally (@androprepe) December 3, 2021
Others were ready to throw the towel in on freedom forever, stating that “It’s also really not that big of a deal even if it is forever.”
It doesn’t sound alarming at all. It sounds appropriate and necessary given the law regarding temporary orders in Oregon. It’s not forever, it’s just for as long as necessary, and 180 days isn’t long enough. It’s also really not that big of a deal even if it is forever.
— 👑 King of the Internets 👑 (@k_of_the_i) December 4, 2021
Outdoor masking in Oregon was a requirement for several months until the OHA repealed the mandate in November, although they retained indoor mask requirements.
Johns Hopkins Professor and health expert Marty Makary is opposed to indefinite mandates due to the potential unintended consequences of being overly cautious.
“We may have a baseline rate of COVID cases hovering around where they are now in the Southeast forever,” Makary explained in November according to Fox News. “We are entering an endemic phase and the question we need to ask as a society is, do we want a perpetual society with people masked?”
“And the marginal benefit of masking is diminishing as the prevalence declines,” Makary continued. “Also, in many instances we’re requiring masks of people at the absolute lowest risk and by insisting on throwing the kitchen sink at virus transmission we will have to pay the piper somehow. That may come in the form of a loss of human connection, more increased mental health problems, and in children a series of problems including issues in development and speech development and other downsides.”
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Big yikes!’ SNL cold open mocking Biden and Dems over midterms painfully unfunny - November 6, 2022
- Michael Moore ‘optimistic’ about Dems’ chances in midterms – because he doesn’t ‘live in a bubble’ - November 6, 2022
- ‘You mean women?’ Bette Midler encouragement to vote on behalf of ‘people with uteri’ doesn’t go well - October 30, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.