Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
In a stunning tweetstorm posted Thursday, Lin Wood, the powerhouse attorney previously responsible for Richard Jewell and Nick Sandmann’s successful lawsuits against the establishment media, unleashed on Supreme Court Justices John Roberts and Stephen Breyer over their alleged “corruption and deceit.”
The tweetstorm began shortly after noon when Wood tweeted, “This may be most important tweet of my life. Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately.”
Why should they resign? Because Wood alleged both are “anti-Trumpers” who he claimed are “dedicated to preventing [the] public from knowing [the] TRUTH” that President Donald Trump was reelected to office last month.
As evidence, he claimed that he’d apparently overheard or heard about a Sept. 19th phone call between Roberts and Stephens in which Roberts allegedly referred to the president as a “motherf–ker” and vowed that he would “never” be re-elected to office.
Look:
This may be most important tweet of my life.
Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately.
They are “anti-Trumpers” dedicated to preventing public from knowing TRUTH of @realDonaldTrump re-election.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
In discussing @realDonaldTrump in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.”
Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
Corruption & deceit have reached most powerful office in our country – the Chief Justice of U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a sad day for our country but a day on which we must wake up & face the truth.
Roberts is reason that SCOTUS has not acted on election cases. Others involved.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
If you’re shocked, then prepare yourself, because this was just the beginning of what turned into an hours-long lecture on Roberts’ alleged evil.
In his next tweet, Wood suggested that the mysterious “John Roberts” whose name appears on deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs for Feb. 10th, 2011 may very well be the John Roberts who serves as chief justice of the Supreme Court.
Look:
I have long had questions about “the John Roberts” on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH.
America is now entitled to know the answer.
Every lie will be revealed.
Pray.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
To this day, it’s not clear whom the “John Roberts” references, whether it’s Justice Roberts, Fox News’ John Roberts, or some other obscure John Roberts.
Speaking of Fox’s temperamental John Roberts, he claimed in a tweet last year that the “John Roberts” absolutely is not him:
To anyone who thinks this might be me, I did not know Epstein, never met him, and certainly never flew on any of his aircraft. pic.twitter.com/sakGSDZTE4
— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) August 14, 2019
This isn’t the first time Wood has accused John Roberts of the high court of being the one who apparently used to fly with Epstein.
Look:
A “John Roberts” flew on Jeffrey Epstein private jet on at least 2 occasions – 3/22/10 & 2/10/11. Chief Justice John Roberts was sworn into office 9/29/05. How many times did Chief Justice Roberts join liberals as the swing vote PRIOR to 2/10/11? How many times SINCE 2/10/11?
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) June 30, 2020
I think the “John Roberts” on Jeffrey Epstein jet flight logs will have some explaining to do soon.
Wonder if “he” is the same “John Roberts” who is Chief Justice of US Supreme Court.
Anyone else want to know answer or is it just me?#FightBack Against Judicial Corruption https://t.co/u3F13NDEYe
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) October 20, 2020
As Thursday progressed, Wood kept circling back to his original complaints about Roberts and Breyer and claimed that the “documentation” he has that apparently prove these complaints true “has been placed in [the] hands of several third parties.”
The “third parties” were not identified.
The documentation of my claims about Justices Roberts & Breyer has been placed in hands of several third parties.
When one cannot attack message, all too often messenger is attacked.
But TRUTH cannot be denied. It cannot be destroyed. I have made sure of that TRUTH.
– Lin 🙏
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
I think many are today learning why SCOTUS is rejecting petitions seeking FAIR review. Roberts & Breyer are “anti-Trumpers” They should resign immediately. CJ Roberts has other reasons to resign. He is a disgrace to office & to country.@SidneyPowell1@realDonaldTrump https://t.co/KvjihiLvLT
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
By the way, if my date below is incorrect by a couple of months, just ask Chief Justice John Roberts. He can give you the exact date of his incriminatory phone conversation. While you have his attention, ask him some other questions. He owes The People answers. He owes us TRUTH. https://t.co/8pPduB7Cr1
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
Chief Justice John Roberts wields great power.
(1) has significant influence in selection of cases for review (2) presides over oral arguments (3) leads discussion of cases among the justices.
When court renders an opinion, if in majority, he chooses who writes court’s opinion.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
Excellent thread to read & consider.
A judge must be impartial. Chief Justice has proven by his documented profane comments about @realDonaldTrump that he is biased.
At a minimum, barring further embarrassing disclosures, Roberts should recuse himself Trump election cases. https://t.co/DJj2K5ywmt
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
One of the things I admire about @realDonaldTrump is that his fundamental policy positions do not change. Reminds me of Ronald Reagan.
President Trump’s 2012 view of public confidence in Supreme Court remains true in 2020.
We The People have NO confidence in C.J. John Roberts. https://t.co/hDhkX66SAh
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
The People have list of questions for C.J. Roberts based on bizarre votes on major cases starting with Obamacare. But let’s ask him just two:
1. Are you the John Roberts on Epstein flight logs?
2. Did you say about @realDonaldTrump “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.”— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
Answers to 2 simple questions below will tell We The People ALL we need to know about Chief Justice John Roberts.
We The People are entitled to answers. You work for us, Justice Roberts. Answer these questions. They will not go away.
You cannot fly TRUTH away on Epstein jet. https://t.co/X6f5EFNyNs
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
Without specifically referencing Roberts or Breyer, the president himself got in on the SCOTUS- bashing with a tweet posted late Thursday in which he claimed that he and “our great country” are “very disappointed in the United States Supreme Court.”
Look:
I am very disappointed in the United States Supreme Court, and so is our great country!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 18, 2020
The SCOTUS-bashing is motivated in part by the high court preemptively rejecting Texas’s lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin last week by declining to even hear the case.
“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially
cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot,” the ruling reads.
The suit was basically rejected on procedural grounds, not on merit.
However, during a Texas legislative session earlier this week, Texas state Rep. Matt Patrick claimed that on the day of the high court’s rejection, a staffer had heard Roberts calling for the dismissal of the case despite its potential merit because he was afraid of the riots that left-wing extremists have been committing.
Watch (*Language warning):
SCOTUS.⚖️
“I don’t give a #@&^ about ‘Bush v. Gore’… at that time we didn’t have RIOTS!”
A staffer “heard *SCREAMING* through the walls as Justice Roberts & other liberal Justices were insisting this case *NOT* be taken up…”
Wonder why Texas’ case was dropped? Here’s why: pic.twitter.com/rCpf5vwqSQ
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 17, 2020
To be clear, this is just an allegation and hasn’t been confirmed true.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
Vivek@bizpacreview.com
V. Saxena is a staff writer for BizPac Review with a decade of experience as a professional writer, and a lifetime of experience as an avid news junkie. He holds a degree in computer technology from Purdue University.
- ‘It must be an insurrection’: Pro-Palestine protestors fill California State Capitol, force lawmakers to adjourn early - January 5, 2024
- ‘I enjoy making men uncomfortable’: Critics predict ‘Disney’s biggest flop yet’ as feminist director’s past comments resurface - January 5, 2024
- Musk SCORCHES Mark Cuban with one line in DEI debate: ‘Cool, so when should we expect …’ - January 5, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
