The innuendo surrounding deceased billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s life and lifestyle continues to grow stranger and more disturbing by the day.
Only three days after law enforcement sources confirmed with the New York Post that Epstein had a painting of former President Bill Clinton in a blue dress hanging at his Manhattan townhouse, the Miami Herald obtained confirmation of something else just as bizarre and troubling.
“A decade ago, during a brief stint in Palm Beach County Jail, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein made an odd purchase at the facility’s store: two pairs of small women’s panties, size 5,” the outlet reported on Saturday.
The report continued, “It was just one of thousands of dollars of purchases made by the disgraced financier while in jail after pleading guilty in 2008 to soliciting a minor for sex, according to a purchase log.”
What’s most troubling about this discovery is that a pair of size 5 panties “wouldn’t fit an average-sized adult woman,” as noted by the Herald.
“But the panties raise questions about why a childless male inmate, accused of sexually abusing girls as young as 14, would be allowed to buy female undergarments so small that they wouldn’t fit an average-sized adult woman.”
— Katie Phang (@KatiePhang) August 18, 2019
So why did he purchase panties? While it’s possible he bought them to wear, it seems unlikely given their size; he reportedly weighed 180 pounds and stood six-foot tall.
“The panties were certainly too small for Epstein, who also purchased his briefs in men’s medium and sweatshirts ranging from XL to 3XL, and size-12 shoes,” the Herald notes.
It seems more likely therefore that he bought them for someone else. But who? And why was his unusual purchase never investigated by anyone, given his history with minors?
What’s known is that, while incarcerated at the Palm Beach County Jail, Epstein participated in a reportedly “generous work release program” that allowed him to spend 12 hours a day at his office. He was also reportedly permitted to spend some of his “outside the cell” time at home.
What’s unclear is whether he was allowed to take the panties home with him. If he was, the chances of him having given them to someone — perhaps a minor — seems highly likely.
The Herald notes that the jail captain defended the special treatment that Epstein received.
“His financial status lends itself to his being victimized while in custody and as such, he has been placed in special management,” Capt. Mark Chamberlain had written in a memo. “He is poorly versed in jail routine and society and his adjustment to incarceration will most likely be atypical. For the time being, I am authorizing that his cell door be left unlocked and he be given liberal access to the attorney room where a TV will be installed.”
But as time progressed, this “special management” transformed into the work release program mentioned before. And according to Bradley Edwards, an attorney for some of Epstein’s alleged victims, the billionaire pedophile often used this work release time to commit more crimes.
“Edwards … has alleged that Epstein used his work release hours to engage in sexual exploits behind closed doors,” the Herald reported. “A release of court records earlier this month quoted a young female college student allegedly recruited by Epstein’s associates saying he required ‘three orgasms a day’ to function. ‘It was biological. Like eating,’ she said Epstein told her.”
This stunning report about the deceased billionaire pedophile’s easy jail life and bizarre purchase of panties emerged the same day that another report dropped linking Epstein to British royal Prince Andrew, Duke of York, 59.
Video footage obtained by the Daily Mail shows Andrew briefly glancing out the door of Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse in 2010.
Source: Daily Mail
“The footage of the Duke of York – then the UK’s Special Representative for International Trade – was taken less than an hour after Epstein, who had been convicted of sex with a child in 2008, left the house in the company of a young, shivering blonde woman,” the Mail reported.
“The video was shot on December 6, 2010, during a visit by the Prince to Epstein’s 90 story, 21,000 square foot mansion dubbed the ‘House of Horrors’ by many of his young victims,” the report continued. “By then Epstein – who took his own life last weekend – was on a child sex offender register, yet one observer told The Mail on Sunday that several of the women leaving and entering the home while Andrew was apparently inside ‘looked very young indeed.'”
The prince is one of the men who was named in a lawsuit filed by Epstein’s alleged “sex slave,” Virginia Roberts Giuffre, regarding the powerful men whom she’d allegedly been forced to have sex with.
In the 2015 suit, she claimed she’d been 17 when she slept with Andrew in 2001. While the prince continues to deny the claims, her father doesn’t believe him.
“I don’t know the full facts about Prince Andrew, as far as did he think she was 18 at the time,” he said to the Daily Mail last week. “She probably looked 18 but she wasn’t. I don’t really know what he did but I guess he was trying to date my daughter. He knows the truth and has to live with what has happened.”
Other notable men who’ve been linked to Epstein’s illicit activities include Bill Clinton, famed attorney Alan Dershowitz, former Democrat New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former Democrat Sen. George Mitchell.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Biden snubs Netanyahu thus far after big election win, but call expected ‘soon’ - November 6, 2022
- RNC chair flips CNN ‘election denier’ narrative: Dems are ‘inflation deniers… crime deniers’ - November 6, 2022
- Tudor Dixon goes scorched earth on Stephen Colbert after ‘apology’ for doubting Muslim parent is real - November 6, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.