Five dozen former classmates of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have signed a letter refuting the latest sexual assault allegations against him and calling them “reprehensible.”
“We never witnessed any behavior that even approaches what is described in this allegation. It is reprehensible,” they wrote in a letter submitted Wednesday to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“In the extensive amount of time we collectively spent with Brett, we do not recall having ever met someone named Julie Swetnick. Nor did we ever observe Brett engaging in any conduct resembling that described in Ms. Swetnick’s declaration.”
NEW: WhiteHouse issues letter signed by 60 former Georgetown Prep classmates (m/f) defending Brett Kavanaugh pic.twitter.com/smc1J4BcOF
— Richard Madan (@RichardMadan) September 26, 2018
A client of creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, accuser Julie Swetnick claimed this week that during high school parties she had attended while she was in college in the 1980s, she observed Kavanaugh and his friend Mike Judge present at parties where “gang rapes” of young women occurred. Despite observing these alleged gang rapes, she continued attending the parties.
A number of questions immediately come to mind. Why would a college student attend high school parties with underage boys? Why has nobody else who witnessed these rapes spoken up? And why had Swetnick continued attending these parties knowing full well that rapes were occurring at them?
My question for Julie Swetnick: Approximately how many of these high school gang rape parties did you attend while in college?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 26, 2018
Hey @MichaelAvenatti
Why was your Client Julie Swetnick (a COLLEGE Student and adult) at the time going out of her way to hang out with 15,16, 17 y/o high schoolers known for gang raping women and Spiking PUNCH?
Also Here are a few other Questions for you… pic.twitter.com/jWI3hXwgDg— Stephanie Hamill (@STEPHMHAMILL) September 26, 2018
If women kept getting drugged and gang raped at all those parties, why did Julie Swetnick continue to attend them? She sounds mentally ill.
— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) September 26, 2018
Julie Swetnick’s story makes no sense:
She claims she witnessed rape gang parties & that she went to 10 of these parties.
If she knew rapes were happening, WHY did she keep going to these parties & WHY didn’t she report the rapes to protect girls? #FordHearing
— #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) September 27, 2018
Even more concerning is Swetnick’s own history of questionable behavior. Within the past 10 years she’s had two tax liens filed against her — one for $100,000 that she eventually settled in 2015, and one for $62,000 that she settled in 2016.
In 2001 her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, filed a restraining order against her after she reportedly threatened him and his family.
“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” he said in a phone interview with Politico. “I know a lot about her. She’s not credible at all. Not at all.”
Swetnick also has a history of filing complaints against others. In 1993 she filed a criminal harassment complaint against a Maryland podiatrist and his wife. That complaint was withdrawn months later.
Two decades later, she filed a sexual harassment complaint against her former employer, York Life Insurance Co. The company eventually reached a financial settlement with her. What’s disconcerting is that the law firm she hired to represent her was owned by Debra Katz, the same attorney currently representing Kavanaugh’s other accuser, Christine Blasey Ford.
The reaction on Twitter to this stunning connection was one of shock and suspicion:
The fact that Katz represented Swetnick 10 years ago in a sexual harassment case is HUGE.
It creates the link between all these liars. It’s this Katz woman. She is the mastermind.
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) September 27, 2018
What are the odds?
Same law firm that sued for Julie Swetnick now represents Christine Blasey Ford…
Debra Katz has been recruiting “Victims” for the Democrats?https://t.co/hLBP3boFGb #IngrahamAngle #HoldTheVote pic.twitter.com/NaZVTOLEdi— Deplorable❌ Rāzərbak (@MediaJuggernaut) September 27, 2018
Real motive of Ms. Swetnick➡️Last lawsuit payout was 2 years ago with Debra Katz representing her..not surprising. Money must be running out. This is how libnuts make a living while ruining innocent people’s lives. Avanetti’s probably close by circling another con-artists sham!
— cl (@clteach06) September 27, 2018
?IT’S A SMALL WORLD AFTER ALL
IT’S A SMALL WORLD AFTER ALL
IT’S A SMALL SMALL WORLD! ?So you were being used as a front man to hide Katz’s involvement with Swetnick. So Katz is really running TWO Kavanaugh accusers, not just one.https://t.co/TVTI8TGxf5 pic.twitter.com/75WsfqbgEu
— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) September 27, 2018
So now we know Swetnick has dealings with George Soros backed Debra Katz too. Is Avenatti being used as a pasty here? Throwing him to the wolves while Debra Katz and Ricki Seidman pull the strings behind the scenes?
It’s unreal how much shit can be stirred by a small group.
— ??John #KAG????? (@JohnCooper0610) September 27, 2018
The belief by many, including President Donald Trump, is that all these spurious allegations are part of a “con game” being run by Democrats in a bid to prevent Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the high court. The growing evidence suggests they may be right.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘It must be an insurrection’: Pro-Palestine protestors fill California State Capitol, force lawmakers to adjourn early - January 5, 2024
- ‘I enjoy making men uncomfortable’: Critics predict ‘Disney’s biggest flop yet’ as feminist director’s past comments resurface - January 5, 2024
- Musk SCORCHES Mark Cuban with one line in DEI debate: ‘Cool, so when should we expect …’ - January 5, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.