Toni Airaksinen, Campus Reform
The authors of a new study suggest that “masculine traits” give male professors an advantage over their female colleagues when it comes to letters of recommendation.
The study, “Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact,” was published in the Journal of Business and Psychology by a team of researchers led by University of Houston Professor Juan Madera.
To gain a deeper understanding of gender bias in academia, Madera and his colleagues obtained 624 authentic letters of recommendation written for 174 professors and reviewed them for the presence of “doubt raisers.”
These doubt raisers—described as “phrases or statements that question an applicant’s aptness for a job”—included phrases such as “somewhat challenging personality,” “might make a good colleague,” and “in light of difficulties…performance was impressive.”
Just as the researchers hypothesized, more doubt was conveyed in letters of recommendation for women. But only slightly.
A review of the research findings indicates that 46 percent of letters for female professors contained no doubt raisers, whereas 49 percent of letters for male professors were free of such vacillations.
Despite this small difference, the researchers nevertheless concluded that recommendation letters are a vector of gender bias in academia.
“Our studies show how bias in the letter-writing process can be propagated, even if evaluators do not necessarily display overt gender biases,” the team concluded. “The differences in word choice may seem negligible, but in fact, as our data show, doubt raisers have discernible penalties for women in academia.”
The researchers suggest that this disparity, though small, may be due to a conflict between the “masculine norms” of academia and women’s socialization under patriarchy.
“Responsibilities of academics have been based historically on masculine traits, such as being assertive, competitive, authoritative, independent, and experts in their field,” the researchers claim.
“All of these traits are tied to agency, which are a set of traits that men, but not women, are expected to hold,” they add. “Women, in contrast, are expected to be communal, which includes being concerned with the welfare of other people, affectionate, kind, sensitive, and nurturing.”
Reached by Campus Reform, lead author Juan Madera affirmed his belief that letters of recommendation are biased against women due to the “norms of masculinity” in academia, such as “being independent, assertive, confident, and strong-willed.”
“The responsibilities of many academic departments may be based on norms of masculinity,” he said. “So what we found is that the letters for women contained more doubt raisers than did letters for men.”
Campus Reform asked Madera if it is possible that instead of letter writers being biased against women, that female professors actually display less assertiveness and confidence than their male counterparts, but he did not respond.
Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen
Fight back against media bias.
CampusReform.org has resolved to fight back. Every day, our on-campus correspondents shine a light on the outrageous discrimination and abuse conservative students face.
But since CampusReform.org doesn’t have the corporate funding of mainstream media organizations—who repeatedly refuse to cover these stories—our ability to report the truth relies on the help of concerned Americans like you to turn these attacks into national headlines.
Millions of Americans regularly learn the truth through CampusReform.org. Will you help reach millions more with your gift today?
STOP MEDIA BIAS AND SUPPORT CAMPUS REFORM NOW »
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘No other way to spin it’: CNN expert says inflation number ‘positive news’ - December 18, 2025
- Fairfax County freed illegal despite ICE request — now a man is dead - December 18, 2025
- US may be entering moderate moment as voters reject radicalism, poll suggests - December 18, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
