Democrats like Nancy Pelosi don’t want to face the reality of what they did to Supreme Court nominations from Republican presidents in the past.
At a recent press conference, a reporter from The Daily Caller asked the San Francisco representative about the history of her party obstructing picks like Judge Robert Bork, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987.
“I get your point, but your point isn’t well taken,” Pelosi told the reporter. “I don’t remember anybody saying there the president should not appoint, and we will not even interview his appointee, we will not have a hearing. That’s what I’m talking about, obstruction.”
It’s sounds like she’s talking about semantics.
Watch the clip below.
[wpvideo GQz68cLK]
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Britney Spears shows off her rockin’ new bod, but had to spoil it with a liberal message about ‘Dreamers’ - December 24, 2017
- Border patrol forget they’re supposed to be heartless, deliver beautiful baby at the border - December 24, 2017
- After scoring tax cut victory, Trump sees ‘tremendous Democrat support’ for his next big initiative - December 24, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
