Pelosi calling strike ‘disproportionate’ a real slap in the face: How many more US troops would need to die?

(Image: Fox News screenshot)

Rep. Lee Zeldin ripped House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for her criticism of President Trump for ordering the drone strike that killed an Iranian terror mastermind.

The New York Republican wondered how many U.S. troops have to be killed or “lose limbs” for the death of  General Qassim Soleimani to be considered “proportionate” in the eyes of Pelosi who condemned the airstrike and the president for “engaging in provocative and disproportionate actions.”

Zeldin spoke out during an interview on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle” along with Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, defending the president’s decision while slamming Democrat leaders for their “double standards.”

The targeted Iranian general in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and the commander of its Quds Force, was reportedly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans as Democrats have repeatedly acknowledged. However, Trump’s decision to order the strike that killed Soleimani, Abu Mahdi al-Mohandas, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, and others before imminent attacks were launched against more American personnel, was resoundingly condemned by the same lawmakers.

Zeldin pointed to the double standard when comparing the treatment of Trump to that of his predecessor, former President Obama who ordered over 500 drone strikes over his two terms, 10 times as many as President George W. Bush who served during the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. He also slammed Pelosi for her remarks.

“Disproportionate? How many hundreds of more U.S. troops have to be killed Nancy Pelosi before it’s proportionate?” the member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee asked.

“How many more thousands of U.S. troops have to lose limbs before it’s proportionate, Nancy Pelosi?” Zeldin sked. “This was done protect American diplomats and American service members. It was an emergency. It was done effectively. It was appropriate. It was legal. It was proportionate.”

The congressman echoed Trump’s words about desiring to end wars, not start them as he reiterated that the strike against the Iranian military leader was not meant to engage the Islamic nation in a military battle but as an offensive move meant to protect Americans from Soleimani who the Pentagon said was “developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq” and the Middle East region.

Zeldin slammed 2020 Democratic presidential candidates who have been blasting the president’s actions while on the campaign trail and others for accusing Trump of killing Soleimani to distract from his impeachment. Zeldin argued that it seems as if Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and foreign minister of Iran, Mohammad Javad Zarif, have been “writing the talking points” for the Democrats.

Zeldin continued his defense of the president on Twitter where he offered a clearer picture of the Iranian military leader.

“All I’m upset about is we weren’t able to blow him up twice,” the New York lawmaker tweeted. “Good riddance. The world is a better place without him.”


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Frieda Powers


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles