Trump accused of ‘war crimes’ by liberal journos after his al-Baghdadi presser

Screengrab CSPAN

Killing Islamic terrorist leaders can be celebrated, but don’t talk about taking the oil in regions they controlled or you’ll be accused of a “war crime.”

President Donald Trump is drawing criticism over his announcement of the death of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, specifically for speaking about the oil in northern Syria.

“Where Lindsey and I totally agree is the oil,” Trump said. “The oil is so valuable. For many reasons. It fueled ISIS: number one. Number two: it helps the Kurds. Because it’s basically been taken away from the Kurds. They were able to live with that oil. And number three: it can help us because we should be able to take some also.”

“And what I intend to do, perhaps, is make a deal with an Exxon or Mobil, or one of our great companies, to go in there and do it properly,” he continued. “Right now it’s not big – it’s big oil underground. But it’s not big oil up-top. Much of the machinery’s been shot and dead. It’s been through wars.”

He made it a point to say the purpose of protecting and securing the oil is to “spread out the wealth.”

The president also reminded reporters of his stance on oil in regard to the Iraqi War.

“If you read about the history of Donald Trump, I was a civilian,” he said. “I had absolutely nothing to do with going into Iraq and I was totally against it. But I always used to say, If they’re going to go in – nobody cared that much but it got written about – if they’re going to go in, I’m sure you’ve heard the statement because I’ve made it more than any human being alive. If they’re going into Iraq, ‘Keep the oil.’ They never did.”

Trump said in the third reason cited that the oil “can help us,” and that sent the anti-Trump cabal into a conniption, accusing the president of not being in compliance with the Geneva Convention and of committing a “war crime” in wanting to take the oil.

University College London Professor and political scientist Brian Klaas was among the first to call Trump a war criminal for “plundering oil.”

“Just to be clear: despite Trump’s statements, oil in Syria does not belong to the United States or to Donald Trump. Plundering oil, as Trump seems to be suggesting, would be a violation of international law and could amount to a war crime,” Klaas tweeted.

Trump’s remarks had critics in a mad dash to quote international law and cite the Geneva Convention.

Here’s a sampling of a few of those responses.

Of course, there is another possibility that could be at play here, as an astute social media user noted in response to a tweet from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

“Trump has seized the oil so he could use it as a bargaining chip to get something the West wants from Assad and make peace with him and turn off the sanctions on Syria and let the peaceful people rebuild,” read the tweet.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Tom Tillison


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles