Nadler steps out of bounds into ‘harassment’ in latest round of Kavanaugh doc requests

(Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Rep. Jerry Nadler was accused of “harassment” by the House Judiciary Committee’s top Republican after a request for documents related to Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Rep. Doug Collins called the panel’s chairman out for unethical behavior as he slammed Democrats for attempting to “tarnish” Kavanaugh’s name in their latest “fishing expedition.”

(Image: screenshot)

“Chairman Nadler’s request is so far outside the scope of judicial ethics, it’s harassment,” the Georgia Republican said in a statement Tuesday, condemning a move by Democrats seeking records from Kavanaugh’s time serving in the George W. Bush administration.

Nadler joined Georgia Democrat Hank Johnson in requesting from the National Archives last week “certain presidential records related to Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s service in the White House from 2001 to 2006.”

The letter claimed that “tens of thousands of documents” from Kavanaugh’s time in the White House Counsel’s Office had been withheld by a private attorney during his confirmation process.

“As a result of this process, the Senate Judiciary Committee received only a small fraction of Justice Kavanaugh’s White House record before voting on his nomination,” Nadler wrote.

(File Photo: screenshot)

The letter specifically requested any “emails sent to or received by Justice Kavanaugh, including emails on which he was a carbon copy or blind carbon copy recipient, during the period in which Justice Kavanaugh served as staff secretary, including any documents attached to such emails.”

The documents, to be submitted on a “rolling basis,” were to include “textual records contained in Justice Kavanaugh’s office files from the period during which he served as Staff Secretary.”

Kavanaugh’s full records are set to be released by the National Archives in 2021 but Nadler invoked his panel’s oversight responsibility in defense of the request for the documents.

“The Committee’s jurisdiction encompasses the laws governing judicial ethics and the judicial oath of office; judicial disqualification, and misconduct; and the organization of the Supreme Court,” he wrote. “As it has in the past, the committee is considering legislative proposals to create a code of conduct for Supreme Court justices. It has also reviewed proposals in recent years regarding transparency in the Supreme Court’s proceedings, the adequacy of the justices’ financial disclosures and the circumstances in which justices or judges must disqualify themselves from the cases.”

Collins ripped into Democrats and their attempts to smear Kavanaugh who was confirmed to the Supreme Court in October 2018 after a contentious hearing process.

“Judiciary Democrats failed in their attempt to relitigate the Mueller investigation, so now they’re pivoting to attack a sitting Supreme Court Justice by reinvestigating issues examined during his Senate confirmation,” Collins said.

“When are we going to move on from the smear campaigns, and begin working on real, bipartisan solutions to improve the lives of the Americans we were elected to represent?” the committee’s ranking Republican asked.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Frieda Powers

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles