‘You don’t have a clue’: Feinstein gets taken to gun school 101 for her proposed ‘assault weapons’ ban

(Video screenshots)

Despite years of gun experts trying to explain to her that the term is flawed, Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein continues nevertheless to misuse the term “assault weapons” in her relentless bid to regulate the Second Amendment into near non-existence.

Case in point: On Wednesday she and her Democrat peers in the Senate introduced an “Assault Weapons Ban of 2019” bill that would “ban the sale, transfer, manufacture and importation of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Except there’s no such thing as “military-style assault weapons.” There are however certain “cosmetic features” that grossly misinformed Democrats like Sen. Feinstein think have the power to magically transform an otherwise regular weapon into a military-styled one.

In the case of her new bill, these cosmetic traits include, as an example, “a pistol grip, a forward grip, a barrel shroud, a threaded barrel or a folding or telescoping stock.”

But as noted by actual gun experts such as National Rifle Association spokeswoman Dana Loesch, these are all cosmetic features that have no effect whatsoever on a weapon’s capabilities:

Those are all valid points. Here’s another one touted by social media:


Democrats oppose President Donald Trump’s plan to construct a wall along the southern U.S. border. Why? Because they allege that the wall would do little to curb illegal immigration.

Numerous current/former U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials and U.S. Customs and Border Protection have said otherwise, but Democrats think they know better.

What remains unclear is why the same Democrats who oppose the wall think that implementing draconian regulations on firearms would stop mass shootings and “protect our children.”

Especially given that just like with the facts surrounding the border wall, the facts pertaining to gun regulations shows that their narrative is patently false — regulations would not stop mass shootings. It’s not even clear that regulations would even reduce their occurrence.



Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles