CNN, which has faced stinging criticism over the past year for its various contributors’ increasingly racially charged rhetoric, has found itself under the spotlight again — this time for anti-semitism.
Speaking Wednesday at a United Nations-organized observance event for the terrorist-affiliated Palestinians, CNN political commentator Marc Lamont Hill appeared to endorse violent resistance against Israel and call for the 70-year nation state’s elimination.
In a speech delivered at the event’s opening meeting, he specifically argued that the Palestinians should be allowed to use methods of violent resistance to combat their alleged oppression by the Israelis.
Listen:
“Contrary to western mythology, black resistance to American apartheid did not come purely through Ghandi and nonviolence. Rather, slave revolts and self-defense and tactics otherwise divergent from Dr. King or Mahatma Gandhi were equally important to preserving safety and attaining freedom,” he said, adding that Palestinians should be permitted to pursue such tactics as well.
“If we are standing in solidarity with the Palestinian people, we must recognize the right of an occupied people to defend itself. We must prioritize peace, but we must not romanticize or fetishize it.”
The U.N. must in particular stop endorsing “narrow politics that shames Palestinians for resisting, for refusing to do nothing in ethnic cleansing,” Hill concluded, adding that true “justice” requires “a free Palestine from the river to the sea.”
The seemingly innocuous phrase “from the river to the sea” is a known rallying cry used by anti-Israel terrorist groups that seek that nation state’s annihilation. Even CNN admits as much, ironically enough.
In a column for CNN last year, Jonathan Cristol of the World Policy Institute noted that calls for the “full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea” are nothing more than “poetic code for ‘the destruction of Israel.'”
During Hill’s speech Wednesday, the CNN commentator also compared the alleged injustices against the Palestinians to the alleged injustice surrounding deceased Missouri suspect Michael Brown’s death.
Listen:
A Ferguson police officer justifiably shot and killed Brown four years ago when the 18-year-old suspect lunged at him. The justified shooting wound up triggering mass protests based on a since-bunked claim that Brown had raised his hands and shouted “don’t shoot” prior to his death.
In one final act of antisemitism against Israel, Hill revealed Wednesday that he’d been boycotting the nation state’s drinking water.
Listen:
The abundance of antisemitic rhetoric from Hill provoked scathing backlash from numerous Jewish figures of prominence, including Sharon Nazarian of the Anti-Defamation League and Anne Bayefsky of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.
“Those calling for ‘from the river to the sea’ are calling for an end to the State of Israel,” Nazarian said in an email to the Jewish Journal. “It is a shame that once again, this annual event at the United Nations does not promote constructive pathways to ‘Palestinian solidarity’ and a future of peace, but instead divisive and destructive action against Israel.”
Nazarian concurred, telling Arutz Sheva that Hill’s “especially obscene” rhetoric — and the reaction it engendered from his audience — was another sign of how far the U.N. has fallen.
“CNN commentator and Temple University professor Marc Lamont Hill’s call at the United Nations for the destruction of the Jewish state was not some accident. He didn’t misspeak. He was an invited guest. He was the only person invited to speak as ‘the’ representative of ‘civil society,'” she said.
“When he ended his extraordinary tirade with ‘Give us a free Palestine from the river to the sea’ his words were met by a round of applause. The only applause for any speaker.”
Hill responded to the criticism from these two and others in a series of tweets Wednesday.
Look:
I believe in a single secular democratic state for everyone. This is the only way that historic Palestine will be free. https://t.co/6RXO7WfwG1
— Marc Lamont Hill (@marclamonthill) November 28, 2018
There was a great deal of two state talk today at the UN. I think my one state allusions were, at best, a minority position. https://t.co/0qLqFa1ArR
— Marc Lamont Hill (@marclamonthill) November 28, 2018
Ummm. That’s absurd. I called for freedom and equal rights for all citizens, irrespective of race, religion, class, gender, or sexual identity. No one should have greater or fewer rights and privileges in a democracy. It’s quite simple. https://t.co/bT3EMowWQ9
— Marc Lamont Hill (@marclamonthill) November 28, 2018
This is silly. And inaccurate. “River to the sea” is a phrase that precedes Hamas by more than 50 years. It also has a variety of meanings. In my remarks, which you clearly didn’t hear, I was talking about full citizenship rights IN Israel and a redrawing of the pre-1967 borders. https://t.co/6jFN22mTcq
— Marc Lamont Hill (@marclamonthill) November 28, 2018
The responses he received suggested few cared for his “excuses,” and many wanted to know if Hill’s employer, CNN would hold him accountable:
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1067960932821884928
Guys you think CNN is actually going to fire Marc Lamont Hill? Farrakhan says the exact same things and he didn’t even lose his twitter account.
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) November 29, 2018
Normally we deal with dog whistles, but Marc Lamont Hill finally just goes full Farrakhan
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) November 28, 2018
Would you accept the, “well I didn’t mean it like that,’ excuse if someone repeated verbatim a racist rallying cry straight out the KKK charter? Of course you wouldn’t, and you shouldn’t.
Either you’re ignorant or you were parroting a Hamas genocidal rallying cry on purpose.
— Jacki Vinson (@jackivinson) November 29, 2018
That is a ridiculous excuse for an obviously genocidal rallying call. When people graffiti swastikas on synagogues and say that they’re just celebrating Hindu culture and that the use of the swastika long predates its association with Nazis, do you believe them too?
— Neinhold Niebuhr (@ReinholdRiebuhr) November 29, 2018
There’s no rationalizing or justification for his statements like he’s trying to do. Can’t walk it back. He’s on record as a Jew hater now.
— Brett Ralston (@VCRalston) November 29, 2018
@marclamonthill is as ignorant as he is blatantly biased against Israel as a Jewish state. Instead of teaching at a university, he actually needs to go back to school and LEARN Middle Eastern history and politics. #farrakhanjr
— Natalie Klyashtorny (@natklyashtorny) November 29, 2018
@marclamonthill is either an Ignorant or a terrorist? Which one would it be? By calling for the destruction of Israel I would go for the second one.
— Felipe Lechter (@Felipe09163642) November 29, 2018
It’s NOT silly. And it has ONE meaning. So…are you an antisemite or just willfully ignorant? Either way a strong apology is in order…
— Laura Ben-David (@LauraBenDavd) November 29, 2018
Pay veeeeery close attention to which writers and which publications call out Marc Lamont Hill’s plea for another Jewish genocide. Something to keep track of.
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) November 28, 2018
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Biden snubs Netanyahu thus far after big election win, but call expected ‘soon’ - November 6, 2022
- RNC chair flips CNN ‘election denier’ narrative: Dems are ‘inflation deniers… crime deniers’ - November 6, 2022
- Tudor Dixon goes scorched earth on Stephen Colbert after ‘apology’ for doubting Muslim parent is real - November 6, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.