Trump, bypassing lower courts, asks Supreme Court to reinstate his ban on trans soldiers

DCNFKevin Daley, DCNF

Government lawyers asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reimpose President Donald Trump’s ban on transgender servicemen in the military Friday, even as federal appeals courts in Washington, D.C., and California are still considering the matter.

Friday’s filing is the latest in a series of high-profile cases in which the government has bypassed normal judicial procedure and taken petitions directly to the high court.

“The district court in this case entered a nationwide preliminary injunction nullifying that exercise of professional military judgment and blocking the implementation of a policy that the secretary has deemed necessary to ‘place the Department of Defense in the strongest position to protect the American people, to fight and win America’s wars, and to ensure the survival and success of our service members around the world,’” the petition said.

The unusual filing is called a petition for certiorari before judgment, meaning that the government would like the Supreme Court to hear the case even though the lower courts of appeal have not yet issued their decisions.

In recent weeks the administration has filed petitions for cert before judgment in cases concerning the citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire and termination of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

The dispute was set off when Trump abruptly announced on Twitter that trans people could no longer serve in the military. Former Defense Secretary Ashton Carter had provided for trans soldiers to openly serve in June 2016.

The policies were immediately challenged in court. A federal trial judge in Washington state issued an injunction barring enforcement of the ban, as did judges in Maryland and Washington, D.C. Those cases are now pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The plaintiffs challenging the ban allege a variety of constitutional violations. They say Trump’s order violates the equal protection and due process guarantees and well as the First Amendment.

Lambda Legal, which is litigating the Washington state case, said the government’s rush to the Supreme Court is highly revealing.

“It seems the Trump administration can’t wait to discriminate,” Lambda Legal counsel Peter Renn said. “Yet again, the Trump administration flouts established norms and procedures. There is no valid reason to jump the line now and seek U.S. Supreme Court review before the appellate courts have even ruled on the preliminary issues before them.”

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Send tips to

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles