Media rushes to defend Serena’s sexism claim. Turns out 20 years of tennis data proves them all wrong.

In their rush to defend tennis player Serena Williams’ game-costing temper tantrums last week at the U.S. Open Tennis Championships, some left-wing pundits rushed right past the actual facts.

According to The New York Times, which deserves some credit for its due diligence, the actual facts show that over the past 20 years, male tennis players have been penalized for misbehavior for more often than their female counterparts.

This also applies to specific forms of misbehavior, including the “verbal abuse” and “racquet abuse” perpetrated by Williams during her match against Naomi Osaka of Japan.

Yet Williams and her supporters still claim that when Umpire Carlos Ramos of Portugal docked points from her for acting like a spoiled brat, he did so because of sexism.

What specifically happened is that Ramos first warned Williams against receiving instructions from her coach, Patrick Mouratoglou, who had been caught on video gesturing directions to her.

Moments later Williams smashed her racket in anger after losing a round to Osaka. Because of her, Ramos went ahead and deducted a full point from her for receiving coaching and losing her temper.

Unfortunately, losing a point only made the tennis star angrier, so she lashed out at Ramos by accusing him of being a “thief.” In response to this “verbal abuse,” Ramos then justifiably deducted another point from her Williams, thus leaving her with too few points to eke out a victory against Osaka.

Here’s a reminder of what all that looked like:

After the match, she rushed to the media to cry about alleged sexism.

“I’ve seen other men call other umpires several things, and I’m here fighting for women’s rights and women’s equality and all kinds of stuff, but for me to say ‘thief’ and for him to take a game? It made me feel like it was a sexist remark. I mean, he’s never taken a game from a man because he said thief. For me, it blows my mind,” she said.

Several in the media bought that narrative hook, line and sinker, including David Love of CNN, who decided to accuse Ramos of not only being a sexist but a racist as well. This is CNN.

“The unfair treatment displayed toward Serena Williams at the US Open is further proof that, in tennis, women are subjected to a double standard. That standard is particularly glaring in the case of female athletes of color,” David Love opined in a column last Monday.

Carron J. Phillips of the New York Daily News bought into this narrative as well, writing, “[I]f you’ve ever wondered what true equality would look like, it would be a world in which Serena Williams and Jalen Hurts could vent their frustrations freely and without repercussions, receiving compassion and understanding, instead.”

Hurts is an Alabama Crimson Tide quarterback whom Phillips also believes has been treated unfairly. In her mind, all black and/or female athletes deserve to be automatically forgiven for misbehaving because to do otherwise would be sexist/racist, never mind the facts.

Except pretty much everybody else in the world disagrees:

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles