Judge Pirro: Strzok wasn’t trying to prevent Trump from winning, what he was doing was even worse’

According to Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro, disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok’s alleged crimes against America transcend beyond him just exchanging 50,000 anti-Trump text messages with his paramour, FBI attorney Lisa Page, during the presidential election in 2016.

After reading some of Strzok’s texts during her opening monologue Saturday evening — including the one in which he cited an “insurance policy” against then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump’s potential election — Pirro argued that his real target had been the American people. Namely, the 60+ million Americans who eventually voted for Trump.

“Strzok wasn’t trying to prevent Trump from winning,” the judge said. “What he was doing was even worse. He was talking about having a plan to effectively disenfranchise the voters who elected Trump. Should Trump win, forget democracy, forget the people. Those voters who Strzok doesn’t like are idiots. He said so himself. In a texting to his mistress.”

Correct. In his text exchanges with his mistress, Strzok characterized Trump’s supporters as ignorant redneck Walmart shoppers who smell.

“If his candidate of choice didn’t win — the one he helped avoid criminal liability — he was going to abuse the tour we entrusted him to insure that it didn’t matter,” Pirro continued, referring to then-Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Clinton was at the time under investigation for shady behavior she had engaged in during her tenure as the secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Despite the copious amount of evidence against her, the FBI eventually let her off the hook.

“If the unthinkable were to happen, his insurance policy would help deal with it. The insurance policy, my friends, is the Russia collusion investigation,” Pirro concluded her monologue.

This line of reasoning makes sense given, one, the investigation’s inability to procure a single piece of concrete evidence linking the president to the Russia, and two, the investigation’s own history of bias. Strzok himself served on the team until special counselor Robert Mueller became aware of his text messages last year.

There have also been reports of Mueller primarily stacking his investigation team with Democrats, including one top prosecutor who sent an email to outgoing acting Attorney General Sally Yates last year praising her for standing up to Trump. Another one of Mueller’s team members previously represented Obama official Ben Rhodes during the Benghazi investigation.

Weighed alongside Mueller’s out-of-control behavior, one can’t help but wonder if perhaps Pirro’s reigns true. And if it is indeed true, then the question becomes this: What do congressional Republicans plan to do, if anything, to stop this biased investigation?


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles