Former director of national intelligence and Obama appointee James Clapper took to the Sunday morning airwaves to weigh in on President Trump’s allegation of wiretapping on the part of Clapper’s former boss.
On NBC’s Meet the Press, Clapper claimed “For the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time, as a candidate, or against his campaign.”
EXCLUSIVE: CLAPPER – " there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president, president-elect, candidate or campaign" #MTP
— NBC News PR (@NBCNewsPR) March 5, 2017
Clapper also told host Chuck Todd that he could have denied a request for a wiretap as head of the US intelligence community. In other words, he was in a prime place to know.
But, as Twitchy notes, Clapper hasn’t always been the source of indisputable information, and plenty of reputable folks were willing to point this out on social media.
Clapper cannot be the final word on any of this – lied to Congress, downplayed Iran threat assessment, misled about bin Laden documents.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) March 5, 2017
Clapper says no wiretapping of Trump Tower. That may be true. But here is another thing Clapper said about surveillance. Under oath. pic.twitter.com/KYBaPotqtV
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) March 5, 2017
Shouldn't Democrats get someone more credible than James Clapper to make these denials? Like any randomly chosen person.
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 5, 2017
However, there was another nugget in the Clapper interview that bears mention. Although Clapper welcomed a broader investigation into Russia’s actions, he saw zero evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign illegally conspired with Russian agents to influence the election.
“We did not include any evidence in our report — and I say, ‘our,’ that’s N.S.A., F.B.I. and C.I.A., with my office, the Director of National Intelligence — that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians,” Clapper said. “There was no evidence of that included in our report.”
Why question Clapper before but believe him here? Well, as a partisan Obama appointee, does anyone truly think Clapper would have held back if he HAD found evidence of that nature?
Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of BizPac Review.
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- West Point accepts Parkland student’s application to military academy after his tragic death - February 21, 2018
- Nancy Pelosi is in middle of grandstanding at Arizona townhall when question yelled from audience grinds it to a halt - February 21, 2018
- Columbine survivor blows media’s plan to exploit naive students – here’s what happens when they grow up - February 20, 2018
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.