While outlining her plan to defeat the Islamic State group at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City Thursday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dismissed the notion that any connection exists between Islam and acts of terror.
“The bottom line is that we are in a contest of ideas against an ideology of hate, and we have to win,” she said. “Let’s be clear, though, Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people, and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.
“The obsession in some quarters with a clash of civilization, or repeating the specific words radical Islamic terrorism isn’t just a distraction, it gives these criminals, these murderers more standing than they deserve. It actually plays into their hands by alienating partners we need by our side.”
Anyone looking for specificity in her proposal to achieve victory against the Islamic terrorists had to have been disappointed. Her plan was long on platitudes and short on details.
“Our strategy should have three main elements,” Clinton said. “One: Defeat ISIS in Syria, Iraq and across the Middle East.”
So, the first step in defeating ISIS is to defeat ISIS?
“Two, disrupt and dismantle the growing terrorist infrastructure that facilitates the flow of fighters, financing, arms, and propaganda around the world,” she continued.
All of which sounds similar to her first step — if we’ve defeated ISIS, we have, by extension, disrupted and dismantled its “ terrorist infrastructure that facilitates the flow of fighters, financing, arms, and propaganda.” But she wasn’t finished.
“Three, harden our defenses and those of our allies against external and homegrown threats,” Clinton said.
And how do we achieve this?
“Local people and nations have to secure their own communities,” she said. “We can help them, and we should, but we cannot substitute for them. … Our increased support should go hand in hand with increased support from Arab partners.”
It sounds painfully similar to what the Obama administration is doing — abdicating America’s traditional role in the world by leading from behind, which is not leading at all.
Watch the clip.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.