Why you should care what happened when actress Eva Mendes linked sweatpants to divorce

It’s not what actress Eva Mendes said this week that is shocking and offensive, it’s the fact that she apologized for it!

The 41-year-old actress and brand new mom told Extra, “You can’t do sweatpants. … No, ladies, No. 1 cause of divorce in America, sweatpants, no!”


Mendes got some serious backlash from women who were offended by the joke. She responded by doing the thing that scares me the most – she apologized!

So just to clarify, in our brave new world we have lying, cheating politicians and celebrities, caught in the act of things like destroying emails, who NEVER apologize. But citizens who make light-hearted comments that could offend some crazy feminists are forced to apologize for their opinions.

It’s mob rule and it’s a slippery slope.

Every time someone caves to crazy people with public apologies, it becomes more and more acceptable for the mob to tell us what we are allowed to say out loud.

In fairness, her apology (below) seems like more of a way to mock those who criticized her. You be the judge.


Boyfriend Ryan Gosling backed up his woman:  

Examples pile up of ridiculous apologies that erode our freedom of speech.

In January, a QVC shopping channel host  was forced to apologize to viewers and the model on a split screen for this comment about owning a Dooney & Burke purse:

“You may look back and think, ‘Why did I wear my hair like that?’ But you’ll like your bag still.”

The model in the split shot (who had nothing at all to do with the sales pitch) happened to be black. The apology was ridiculous and insulting to people who really are discriminated against.

Last month, E! News cancelled its No. 1 fashion show shortly after co-host Giuliana Rancic was forced to grovel at the feet of the public to apologize for a joke that offended people with dreadlocks.  

Even iconic comedian Jay Leno is fed up with the absurdity of it all. In a recent interview Leno blasted college kids for being so “politically correct.”

“No, being anti-guacamole is not racist,” he said. 

We have created these monsters.

So, weigh in on the debate over sweatpants all you want. And please don’t ever apologize for the First Amendment, for heaven’s sake!





Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles