The Florida House Civil Justice Subcommittee approved H.B. 903, the Application of Foreign Law in Certain Cases, on Tuesday along strict party lines — all 7 Republican members present voted to send the measure out of committee, and all four Democrats voted no.
In a case of “deja vu all over again,” this marks the fourth time in four legislative sessions that a similar provision has been presented to Florida lawmakers. The previous three times ended in failure.
If passed into law, the measure would prohibit Florida courts from considering any provision of foreign law inconsistent with the constitutions of the United States or the state of Florida.
The vote went as follows:
Metz, Larry [R] Yes
Hager, Bill [R] Absent
Democratic Ranking Member
Stafford, Cynthia A. [D] No
Clelland, Michael Philip “Mike” [D] No
Davis, Daniel [R] Yes
Goodson, Tom [R] Yes
Hill, Walter Bryan “Mike” [R] Yes
Passidomo, Kathleen C. [R] Yes
Rodríguez, José Javier [D] No
Spano, Ross [R] Yes
Stone, Charlie [R] Yes
Waldman, James W. “Jim” [D] No
Young, Dana D. [R] Yes
The bill provides:
Defines “foreign law, legal code, or system”; specifies public policy on application of foreign law, legal code, or system in proceedings relating to dissolution of marriage, support, time-sharing, UCCJEA, & UIFSA; provides that certain decisions rendered under such laws, codes, or systems are void; provides that certain contracts & contract provisions are void; provides for construction of waiver by natural person of person’s fundamental liberties, rights, & privileges guaranteed by state or federal constitutions; provides that claims of forum non conveniens or related claims must be denied; provides that act doesn’t require or authorize court to adjudicate, or prohibit any religious organization from adjudicating, ecclesiastical matters in violation of specified constitutional provisions or to conflict with any federal treaty or other international agreement to which U.S. is party to specified extent.
Although the measure is not directed against any particular race, ethnicity, religion or country of origin, the Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations has consistently opposed bills similar to this in the past. They’ve often been referred to as “anti-Sharia” bills.
The bill was sent to the 18- member House Judiciary Committee, consisting of 12 Republicans and six Democrats.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.