The Department of Justice filed a civil rights lawsuit accusing a Pennsylvania school district of violating a Muslim employee’s religious freedom by requiring him to comply with its grooming standards.
The School District of Philadelphia established a grooming policy in 2010 that requires police officers and security guards to maintain beards at a maximum quarter-inch length, according to the complaint, Philly.com reported.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Siddiq Abu-Bak, who had not trimmed his beard in the 27 years he worked as a school police officer. Although Abu-Bakr notified the district that his religious beliefs prevented him from cutting his beard, he was reprimanded and told that “further disciplinary action” would result if he didn’t trim his facial hair.
Philly.com reported:
The lawsuit claims the district failed to consider Abu-Bakr’s request for “reasonable accommodation” to its grooming policy. The district instead denied the request without showing that complying would cause undue hardship, according to the suit.
Prosecutors said Abu-Bakr filed a religious discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which referred the matter to the Justice Department after determining there was reasonable cause to support the allegation.
Through the suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States is seeking that the district be required to create new grooming policies that don’t discriminate against employees. The lawsuit is also seeking monetary damages for Abu-Bakr and others who are similarly situated.
“No employee should be forced to violate his religious beliefs in order to earn a living,” Spencer Lewis Jr., district director of the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office, said in a statement. “Modifying a dress or grooming code is a reasonable accommodation that enables employees to keep working without posing an undue hardship on the employer.”
Meanwhile, the Justice Department continues to challenge the Little Sisters of the Poor’s claim that Obamacare’s contraception mandate violates its own religious beliefs. The U.S. Supreme Court granted the Catholic nuns a temporary exemption in January while the issue is litigated in the lower courts.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
Comments are closed.