A Portland, Ore., pimp serving a 100-year sentence for stomping a man’s face has filed a $100 million lawsuit against the shoe manufacturer for not providing a label warning that his Air Jordans could be a dangerous weapon.
Sirgiorgiro Clardy, 26, had decided to settle a dispute with a customer over compensation by beating the john’s face to a pulp with his Nikes, according to The Oregonian.
The jury found Clardy guilty of second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon — his shoes. Now Clardy wants Nike to pay up for not letting him know just how dangerous his Jordans were.
According to The Oregonian:
The jury also found him guilty of robbing the john and beating the 18-year-old woman he forced to work as his prostitute. She was injured so badly that she bled from her ears.
Now finding himself with lots of time on his hands during his stay at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Clardy fired off a three-page, handwritten complaint, listing all the wrongs Nike committed and holding the shoe manufacturer at least partially responsible for the beatings.
“Under product liability there is a certain standard of care that is required to be up-held by potentially dangerous product,” Clardy wrote in the complaint. “Do [sic] to the fact that these defendants named in this Tort claim failed to warn of risk or to provide an adequate warning or instruction it has caused personal injury in the likes of mental suffering.”
The “mental suffering” is his own — not that of the victims he beat within an inch of their lives. Clardy also wrote that he’s attempted suicide multiple times.
Senate Dems deny last-ditch effort to restore military pensions; illegals’ tax refunds win out
In addition to the $100 million in damages, Clardy wants the company to affix a label on its shoes, warning customers of the “potentially dangerous Nike and Jordan merchandise.”
Prosecutors often use the “dangerous weapon” classification to increase criminal penalties, and items like “boots, rope, a phone receiver, scalding hot water and HIV-infected blood” have been used in the past, The Oregonian reported.
The whole theory that the lawsuit is based on is ridiculous, of course. Blaming a pair of shoes for a stomping is like blaming a firearm for a shooting — and no one would do that, would they?
Nike is expected to be served with papers notifying it of the lawsuit sometime this week.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
Comments are closed.