Feinstein: Veterans can’t be trusted with firearms

dianne feinstein with gunDuring a Thursday Senate Judiciary Committee meeting, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., argued against including an amendment that would exempt veterans from her proposed assault weapons ban.

Feinstein opined that returning veterans should not be exempted due to the possibility of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. She did note, however, that government agencies were exempted in the previous 10-year ban, which included active military. In other words, government personnel could own the restricted firearms — individuals not associated with the government could not.

Vision to America reported that Feinstein said in committee:

…this adds an exemption of retired military. As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was effect… and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States… that included active military.

The problem with expanding this is that you know with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this.

So you know I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to — if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon.

Feinstein’s remarks not only mirror those made by Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano last year when she described returning veterans as “right-wing extremists,” but they were also inaccurate.

PTSD is not a new thing — it’s just a new term. At other times it was referred to as “shell shock” or “battle fatigue.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada has noted that any ban on so-called assault weapons would have very little chance of being approved in the Senate, and that it would have almost no chance whatsoever in the House.

Read more at Vision to America.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles